Your First Pick? - Mussorgsky's Pictures At An Exhibition
Your First Pick? - Mussorgsky's Pictures At An Exhibition
The first time I purchased this work, it was a much later recording from the early 90's with Yoel Levi and the Atlanta Symphony on Telarc. Great sound and performance. However, it wasn't till I came across the Fritz Reiner and Chicago Symphony performance from 1957(?), did I believe I had found the definitive performance. Many folks had recommended this recording to me in the past and I finally succumbed. This recording was released on the RCA Living Stereo Series #61958. So what do you say? What's your first pick on this one?
Thomas, I wonder whether you have heard the solo piano versionof this work.
It's a big piece in the piano repertoire. Of course, there are lots of versions of this, as well as of the orchestral versions. No one can hope to hear them all - (and have time for a life beyond that!) But I'd like to know what your reaction is.
It's a big piece in the piano repertoire. Of course, there are lots of versions of this, as well as of the orchestral versions. No one can hope to hear them all - (and have time for a life beyond that!) But I'd like to know what your reaction is.
Werner Isler
YES to the Reiner!
Try to experience it on the recent SACD re-release, if you can. It hasn't sounded better.
Musica magnorum est solamen dulce laborum
-
- Posts: 4687
- Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 3:31 pm
- Location: Brush, Colorado
Whew!--Thanks, Werner, for quickly alerting ALL OF US to the piano version.......as a keyboardist, I have a certain partiality to it, mainly because it's so unfairly downgraded, or rather, treated as a "disappointment" to those weaned strictly on Ravel's orchestration.
In my abbreviated years as a classical pianist, it was one of my personal Everests--my coach told me it would be a "massive undertaking," and Lord was he on the money. Didn't study it past the "Samuel Goldenberg" movement (I worked on it in strict sequence).....but I got some real nice comments at a class-piano session. I was practically on the verge of being unglued playing it at that recital, trying to remember all the exact details of each repetition of "The Old Castle"; but it put an extra edge to my performance!
ANYWAY--on records, I've never seen fit to nudge aside Brendel or Richter......although Awadigan Pratt did some great things with it. I also have an old Philippe Entremont LP, not too good a performance, but a good example of his raw, still-young talent.
ORCHESTRA?--Well, as for Ravel's version, Toscanini's is THE perfect one (he even went those few extra miles & corrected the notes in the obviously-corrupt edition Ravel based his score on--particularly, the C-D flat-B flat-B flat figure that ends "Samuel Goldenberg"). Also, Toscanini corrects a VERY obvious misjudgement in Ravel's arrangement of "Great Gate At Kiev," having the final triumphant repetition of the main theme re-scored: melody in the brass, and the TRIPLET accompaniments (Ravel inexplicably having the brass revert to THOSE at the last note of each phrase of their melody) RE-SCORED for STRINGS.
Also, Ormandy ALWAYS DID WELL by this work: with NONE of his commercial recordings of it can you go wrong (not always the case with his multiple recordings of the same work). Vandernoot/PCO is great also.
I should add, regarding the work itself: it's IMPOSSIBLE for me to think of a more audacious work written in ANY other epoch......think a minute: can you REALLY quite imagine "Pictures At An Exhibition" being written in 1881?
In my abbreviated years as a classical pianist, it was one of my personal Everests--my coach told me it would be a "massive undertaking," and Lord was he on the money. Didn't study it past the "Samuel Goldenberg" movement (I worked on it in strict sequence).....but I got some real nice comments at a class-piano session. I was practically on the verge of being unglued playing it at that recital, trying to remember all the exact details of each repetition of "The Old Castle"; but it put an extra edge to my performance!
ANYWAY--on records, I've never seen fit to nudge aside Brendel or Richter......although Awadigan Pratt did some great things with it. I also have an old Philippe Entremont LP, not too good a performance, but a good example of his raw, still-young talent.
ORCHESTRA?--Well, as for Ravel's version, Toscanini's is THE perfect one (he even went those few extra miles & corrected the notes in the obviously-corrupt edition Ravel based his score on--particularly, the C-D flat-B flat-B flat figure that ends "Samuel Goldenberg"). Also, Toscanini corrects a VERY obvious misjudgement in Ravel's arrangement of "Great Gate At Kiev," having the final triumphant repetition of the main theme re-scored: melody in the brass, and the TRIPLET accompaniments (Ravel inexplicably having the brass revert to THOSE at the last note of each phrase of their melody) RE-SCORED for STRINGS.
Also, Ormandy ALWAYS DID WELL by this work: with NONE of his commercial recordings of it can you go wrong (not always the case with his multiple recordings of the same work). Vandernoot/PCO is great also.
I should add, regarding the work itself: it's IMPOSSIBLE for me to think of a more audacious work written in ANY other epoch......think a minute: can you REALLY quite imagine "Pictures At An Exhibition" being written in 1881?
Good music is that which falls upon the ear with ease, and quits the memory with difficulty.
--Sir Thomas Beecham
--Sir Thomas Beecham
-
- Site Administrator
- Posts: 27613
- Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 2:25 am
- Location: The Great State of Utah
- Contact:
Contrarian that I am, I prefer the piano version to the orchestral. Of the latter, I'd really like to hear the one that was discussed months ago here, the orchestration not by Ravel or Stokowski.Werner wrote:Thomas, I wonder whether you have heard the solo piano versionof this work.
It's a big piece in the piano repertoire. Of course, there are lots of versions of this, as well as of the orchestral versions. No one can hope to hear them all - (and have time for a life beyond that!) But I'd like to know what your reaction is.
Corlyss
Contessa d'EM, a carbon-based life form
Contessa d'EM, a carbon-based life form
-
- Posts: 11954
- Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 7:06 am
- Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Piano: Richter
Ravel Orchestration: Ormandy/Sony (only available as a French or Japanese import unfortunately....it's one of Ormandy's best recordings)
Ravel Orchestration: Ormandy/Sony (only available as a French or Japanese import unfortunately....it's one of Ormandy's best recordings)
"If this is coffee, please bring me some tea; but if this is tea, please bring me some coffee." - Abraham Lincoln
"Although prepared for martyrdom, I preferred that it be postponed." - Winston Churchill
"Before I refuse to take your questions, I have an opening statement." - Ronald Reagan
http://www.davidstuff.com/political/wmdquotes.htm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2pbp0hur ... re=related
"Although prepared for martyrdom, I preferred that it be postponed." - Winston Churchill
"Before I refuse to take your questions, I have an opening statement." - Ronald Reagan
http://www.davidstuff.com/political/wmdquotes.htm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2pbp0hur ... re=related
http://www.cduniverse.com/productinfo.a ... =258746990
If you love this piece, buy this hybrid SACD. (It also plays on regular CD players.) Not only do you get an unsurpassed Pictures, you get several other unsurpassed performances of other popular works.
All for less than $10!!
As to the sound, it is now approaching 50 years old. It's still as good, and natural sounding as I've heard. There is a reason why this, and several other Reiner/CSO recordings, are a very famous recordings among "audiophiles". If you have a SACD player, you will love it.
I also like the Maazel/Cleveland, which also has stunning sound.
If you love this piece, buy this hybrid SACD. (It also plays on regular CD players.) Not only do you get an unsurpassed Pictures, you get several other unsurpassed performances of other popular works.
All for less than $10!!
As to the sound, it is now approaching 50 years old. It's still as good, and natural sounding as I've heard. There is a reason why this, and several other Reiner/CSO recordings, are a very famous recordings among "audiophiles". If you have a SACD player, you will love it.
I also like the Maazel/Cleveland, which also has stunning sound.
-
- Posts: 2201
- Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 5:47 am
-
- Posts: 4687
- Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 3:31 pm
- Location: Brush, Colorado
I've just pulled out my old copy of Saraste's performance, w/Toronto Sym. It's a performing version, put together by the conductor, of the orchestrations of Sergei Gortschakov & Leo Funtek.
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/de ... =classical
Quite a revelation (I've also got Saraste doing it live w/FRSO).......the experience can easily be likened to so many pianists doing different versions of the original; the amount of new light that can be shed on this work simply boggles the mind. "Pictures" is the sort of work that easily accomodates this.
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/de ... =classical
Quite a revelation (I've also got Saraste doing it live w/FRSO).......the experience can easily be likened to so many pianists doing different versions of the original; the amount of new light that can be shed on this work simply boggles the mind. "Pictures" is the sort of work that easily accomodates this.
Good music is that which falls upon the ear with ease, and quits the memory with difficulty.
--Sir Thomas Beecham
--Sir Thomas Beecham
-
- Posts: 1123
- Joined: Wed May 21, 2003 10:42 pm
-
- Site Administrator
- Posts: 20773
- Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 1:27 am
- Location: Binghamton, New York
- Contact:
Well, this is a tough one because there are so many superb recordings of this, both orchestrally and pianistically.
FIRST PICKs for me:
Orchestra: Igor Markevitch: DGG 477.5479; Fritz Reiner: RCA 5407 (or later-issued/numbered releases). Another version on Berlin [2139] by Markevitch is worthy of consideration. Then too, I'd take Stokowski on Decca/London 443.898.
Piano: Vladimir Horowitz: RCA 60449 or 60526; Moiseiwitsch: Dante 024 [two versions]; any of the Richter performances, but Philips 420.774 or 464.734 are sonically the most impressive. Lazar Berman's account on Masters of Art [94062] is pianistically incredible, as is Byron Janis's on Mercury [434.346].
In reality for both the piano- and orchestral versions, there are far too many first-rate performances to select just one, like so many "First Pick" offerings.
An American Decca LP [DL 710042] recording by Benno Moiseiwitsch presents him in his last recordings, but he never lost his flair for this music. I am hopeful all of Moiseitwitsch's last American recordings will be issued one day by either Philips/Universal (who now owns the masters) or by Testament.
FIRST PICKs for me:
Orchestra: Igor Markevitch: DGG 477.5479; Fritz Reiner: RCA 5407 (or later-issued/numbered releases). Another version on Berlin [2139] by Markevitch is worthy of consideration. Then too, I'd take Stokowski on Decca/London 443.898.
Piano: Vladimir Horowitz: RCA 60449 or 60526; Moiseiwitsch: Dante 024 [two versions]; any of the Richter performances, but Philips 420.774 or 464.734 are sonically the most impressive. Lazar Berman's account on Masters of Art [94062] is pianistically incredible, as is Byron Janis's on Mercury [434.346].
In reality for both the piano- and orchestral versions, there are far too many first-rate performances to select just one, like so many "First Pick" offerings.
An American Decca LP [DL 710042] recording by Benno Moiseiwitsch presents him in his last recordings, but he never lost his flair for this music. I am hopeful all of Moiseitwitsch's last American recordings will be issued one day by either Philips/Universal (who now owns the masters) or by Testament.
Lance G. Hill
Editor-in-Chief
______________________________________________________
When she started to play, Mr. Steinway came down and personally
rubbed his name off the piano. [Speaking about pianist &*$#@+#]
Editor-in-Chief
______________________________________________________
When she started to play, Mr. Steinway came down and personally
rubbed his name off the piano. [Speaking about pianist &*$#@+#]
Leibowitz uses the ravel orchestration. The RPO is no match for the virtuosity of the Chicago Symphony Orchestra, but many would be wowed by his intepretation none the less. Really raw with awesome power...the opening of the grand gate of kiev chills the spine!Holden Fourth wrote:Orchestral:
Ravel orchestration - Reiner of course.
Leibowitz orechestration - Leibowitz/RPO
It's shame Leibowitz never conducted/recorded with the Chicago Symphony Orchestra...the results seem like they could only have been spectacular.
-
- Posts: 4687
- Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 3:31 pm
- Location: Brush, Colorado
I'd LOVE to hear Lucien Cailliet's orchestration--he did it when Koussevitzky still had exclusive performance rights to the Ravel one.
Cailliet was bass-clarinetist with the Philadelphia Orchestra, & the Phillies' first recording of the work was this version (under Ormandy, I believe.....Stoky had already split & was leading HIS own arrangement).
Cailliet also did perhaps the best-ever transcription of Clair De Lune.
Cailliet was bass-clarinetist with the Philadelphia Orchestra, & the Phillies' first recording of the work was this version (under Ormandy, I believe.....Stoky had already split & was leading HIS own arrangement).
Cailliet also did perhaps the best-ever transcription of Clair De Lune.
Good music is that which falls upon the ear with ease, and quits the memory with difficulty.
--Sir Thomas Beecham
--Sir Thomas Beecham
-
- Posts: 2201
- Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 5:47 am
Sorry, got confused with Night On Bare Mountain but the comment about RL's Pictures still stands - an outstanding renditionrwetmore wrote:Leibowitz uses the ravel orchestration. The RPO is no match for the virtuosity of the Chicago Symphony Orchestra, but many would be wowed by his intepretation none the less. Really raw with awesome power...the opening of the grand gate of kiev chills the spine!Holden Fourth wrote:Orchestral:
Ravel orchestration - Reiner of course.
Leibowitz orechestration - Leibowitz/RPO
It's shame Leibowitz never conducted/recorded with the Chicago Symphony Orchestra...the results seem like they could only have been spectacular.
For sure...couldn't agree more. The Bald Mountain orchestration/performance alone is worth the price of the disc.Holden Fourth wrote:Sorry, got confused with Night On Bare Mountain but the comment about RL's Pictures still stands - an outstanding renditionrwetmore wrote:Leibowitz uses the ravel orchestration. The RPO is no match for the virtuosity of the Chicago Symphony Orchestra, but many would be wowed by his intepretation none the less. Really raw with awesome power...the opening of the grand gate of kiev chills the spine!Holden Fourth wrote:Orchestral:
Ravel orchestration - Reiner of course.
Leibowitz orechestration - Leibowitz/RPO
It's shame Leibowitz never conducted/recorded with the Chicago Symphony Orchestra...the results seem like they could only have been spectacular.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests