The Classical Music Guide Forums

Welcome to the new Classical Music Guide Online Forums!
It is currently Thu Jun 20, 2013 1:23 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:21 am 
Offline
Site Administrator

Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 1:27 am
Posts: 15104
Location: Binghamton, New York
Image
EMI 9-CD set, 95694

Image

Image
EMI 30-CD set, 03603

Over the years, I've learned to enjoy and appreciate much of the music of Sir Edward Elgar [1857-1934]. My interest in this gifted English composer was further enhanced when EMI issued a budget-priced 30-CD set of predominently later stereo recordings ... most all the important works of Elgar in one box. I thought all the Elgar I would ever want would appear in this 30-CD boxed set.

As we are advised, "The advent of electrical recording enabled Britain's greatest living composer to crown his career with an Indian summer in the studios. etween 1926 and 1933, Elgar recorded virtually all his major orchestral works—as well as choral excerpts and lighter pieces—in accounts as vital as they are authoritative. Ranging from the Violin oncerto with the young Yehudi Menuhin to an intriguing set of piano improvisations (with Elgar at the piano), these nine s of EMI's Gramophone award-winning Edition are collected here for the first time. The Violin Concerto with Menuhin has been previously several times before the present set was issued and it seems to remain the yardstick recording for all the other performances made of this work.

With HMV and British Columbia, Elgar was paid 500 pounds per session to record anything and everything he wanted of his own works. EMI's historical remastering engineer, Andrew Walter, gives a most interesting account about the 78-rpm process back when Elgar made these recordings. Everything heard thus far illustrates some outstanding restoration from the Abbey Road Studios. The first three CDs contain material remastered by Michael J. Dutton, one of the best in the restoration business from my perspective.

The acquisition of The Elgar Edition greatly enhances the 30-CD boxed set pictured above.

_________________
Lance G. Hill
Editor-in-Chief
______________________________________________________

When she started to play, Mr. Steinway came down and personally
rubbed his name off the piano. [Speaking about pianist &*$#@+#]

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 02, 2011 6:04 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 6:21 pm
Posts: 397
Location: NYC
Lance wrote:
The first three CDs contain material remastered by Michael J. Dutton, one of the best in the restoration business from my perspective.


Thanks Lance! Can I ask who did the transfers/mastering for the other 6CDs?

_________________
George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 02, 2011 6:06 am 
Offline
CMG's Chief Decorator

Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 7:59 am
Posts: 3800
Location: In The Steppes Of Central Asia
Lance, I obtained the original gold plated EMI three 3 CD sets when isssued about twenty years ago. Elgar takes his own music at a much faster tempo than other great Elgarians. That may have been because of the time limitations of the first HMV 78's when issued in the 1920's and early 30's. For those who like Elgar taken at a brisker pace than usual, this set is a total delight and very, very highly recommended, in its newest EMI reincarnation. :D :D :D :D ++


Regards,
Mel 8)

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 02, 2011 11:22 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 11:30 am
Posts: 3136
I, too, have the original gold CDs of this material: the recordings were restored by taking the original metal stampers and pressing new vinyl copies from them. Astonishingly good sound, and Elgar is a master conductor of his own works. Highly recommended!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:18 pm 
Offline
Site Administrator

Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 1:27 am
Posts: 15104
Location: Binghamton, New York
The timing situation is addressed in updated notes in the new set. It is not felt that Elgar's tempi were faster because of 78-rpm time limitations, especially when compared to his timings of his works given in live performances.

_________________
Lance G. Hill
Editor-in-Chief
______________________________________________________

When she started to play, Mr. Steinway came down and personally
rubbed his name off the piano. [Speaking about pianist &*$#@+#]

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 02, 2011 3:25 pm 
Offline
CMG's Chief Decorator

Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 7:59 am
Posts: 3800
Location: In The Steppes Of Central Asia
Lance wrote:
The timing situation is addressed in updated notes in the new set. It is not felt that Elgar's tempi were faster because of 78-rpm time limitations, especially when compared to his timings of his works given in live performances.



Lance, but it sounds faster and Solti among others copied Elgar's recorded interpretations, my friend. 8)


Regards,
mel 8)

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 03, 2011 8:48 am 
Offline
CMG's Chief Resident Newbie

Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 3:50 pm
Posts: 3157
Location: Hereford Cathedral
This delightful thread reminds me of my visit to Elgar's birthplace musem, a couple of years ago. It appears that after the death of his dear wife Caroline, his inspiration for penning new material dried up, as he turned his attention to recording his works. Elgar embraced the new technology fully during the late 20's, also having owned several gramophone players during this time, upon which he played his own recordings. A model from the early 30's resides in the museum, complete with a pot of Elgar's own needles which he would have sharpened on a dily basis. The centre of the museum contains many of the original 78s themselves (and if I remember correctly a number of the older wax cylinders)... it's a fascinating subject, and these recordings would I admit, be most enlightening to hear...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 11, 2011 6:45 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 8:48 am
Posts: 519
Location: France
A simple example of how Elgar did not speed up because of short 78 sides is "Nimrod", which he takes in 3' 50", as indicated by his metronome marking - he could have taken another minute over it if he had wished to. Nearly all modern conductors take it much slower: Colin Davis takes over 6' in his most recent version. I have an old Sargent version from the 50s which takes the same time as Elgar's and is no less moving for that. I don't think Elgar wanted overly sentimental readings of his works. I wonder if he would have enjoyed Du Pré's Cello Concerto as much as modern listeners do?

_________________
Cheers

Istvan

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group