

That's right-that graph needs to be redone! Regards, LenJohn F wrote:And zero for actual performances. That's an average day for a failed musician.
I think it means average day when a performance is not scheduled, though when you think about it, what percentage of a full-time performing musician's time is actually spent in delivering the final product? I am inclined to take the pie chart a bit more seriously, to the extent that it was intended seriously at all, because I have seen it on Facebook posted or approved of s by more than one serious professional performing musician. Also, I feel sufficiently versed in the matter to state that the portion devoted to "crippling self-doubt" is scarcely an exaggeration, and is enhanced by "fear of child prodigies." No, really.John F wrote:And zero for actual performances. That's an average day for a failed musician.
You're taking it too seriously. The pie chart is a joke and is meant to be. But for what it's worth, an average day for a musician in the Metropolitan Opera Orchestra (during the season, of course) involves 3 to 6 hours of paid rehearsal time and, depending on the schedule, 3 to 5 hours of performance. How much more time does the musician spend practicing? That depends, of course. I would guess very little except when learning a new and difficult work. The Met's orchestral players and choristers have multi-year contracts, so self-doubt isn't likely to weigh heavily on them, and child prodigies need not apply.jbuck919 wrote:I think it means average day when a performance is not scheduled, though when you think about it, what percentage of a full-time performing musician's time is actually spent in delivering the final product?John F wrote:And zero for actual performances. That's an average day for a failed musician.
Oh, you're still developing repertory? I would have thought from your previous posting that there were no mountains left for you to climb.Auntie Lynn wrote:Comes as no surprise that nobody here knows jack about performing musicians: Me...
50% On the job performance
25% Personal
10% Gym
15% Repertory development
Put up or shut up-document your credentials--also this goes in your dossier as well! LenAuntie Lynn wrote:
Now, here’s some of our CMG posters:
50% trolling CMG in the forlorn hope that SOMEONE will post anything to make it
interesting
25% goldbricking, featherbedding, time-serving, seat-warming at some low-level useless,
redundant job
25% Personal - eating, sleeping and bickering with homely, boring, tiresome wife or
significant.
I know John F and he's no auntie Lynn!jbuck919 wrote: Your assessment of the situation up to this point, but not after, actually resembles that of John F,
It is not terribly difficult to figure out who Lynn is based on information she has provided in her previous posts over many years and a Google search. I have never doubted her claims regarding her own level of accomplishment, no matter how extravagant they have sometimes been. There's plenty of extreme but uncelebrated talent in the world. What I don't understand is why she needs the added gratification of insulting others. If we're that beneath her good opinion, why does she bother to come here at all? She is not the only accomplished musician I have come across who is fond of saying how wonderful she (or he) is because it is not enough to let those whose opinion matters recognize it on their own, but she is the only one who goes this offensive step further.lennygoran wrote:I know John F and he's no auntie Lynn!jbuck919 wrote: Your assessment of the situation up to this point, but not after, actually resembles that of John F,![]()
![]()
![]()
On a more serious note when will Lynn document how great she is-where's the beef-right now she's about as credible as blowhard Trump--Trump likes to say trust me-if Lynn's so great lets see the evidence. Regards, Len
But don't you see that with that statement you are finally revealing a chink in the armor? The self-proclaimed most accomplished pianist in all of San Francisco doesn't look for new repertory appropriate to her abilities on IMSLP unless she is in some way compromised. (Note: It is OK for professional musicians to be compromised. There are few who are not.) IMSLP is where I go to find the secondary Baroque stuff I play on Sunday morning, but I don't pretend to be anything other than a perhaps over-educated simple country organist. It is beyond me what gratification you get out of coming here, where people only want to exchange thoughts on their appreciation of classical music and the mood in recent years has been magnanimous. I haven't even visited the thread in the Pub on Donald Trump to which you have contributed. I blanch to think what you might be dishing out over there that others less exposed to the history of this board than myself might still be taking seriously.Auntie Lynn wrote:And yes, I spend a lot of time on IMSLP, you never know who’s got something
“industrial...”
What I find beyond me is that she's not thrown off the forum-she's the worst-my dossier is full with all the disrespectful insults she's made. Regards, Lenjbuck919 wrote: It is beyond me what gratification you get out of coming here, where people only want to exchange thoughts
Barney wait-can I just think of it as Eurotrash! Regards, Lenbarney wrote: You just have to see it as theatre, Lenny.
I certainly don't like seeing anyone thrown off the board.
OK, B., which of those not mutually compatible statements (in this context) is your real opinion?maestrob wrote:Sorry to say this, but working musicians (as opposed to leading soloists) can be nasty, egotistical and bombastic just like regular folks: it comes with the territory. It's why conductors are known to be domineering rather than friendly and open. Friendly and open simply doesn't work in the orchestra pit: it mostly results in blah music-making. Leonard Bernstein made great music happen in New York, but he had to raise his voice to do it, and demand extra rehearsals to boot. While the players admired him, there were many who were angry & complained.
Auntie Lynn's just letting off steam: she needs to feel superior to someone, which leads me to believe she's working in a typical negative atmosphere where she's put down on a regular basis: this is just how she relates to people. It's sad, really.
And, no, the insults really don't belong here, not at all.
Disturbed people are disturbing.
I have nothing more to say on the subject, except that the Chatterbox is sacred ground, and should be respected.
Maybe she's angry and bitter because she lost her job at SF Ballet-maybe they fired her-maybe they fired her for her persona-who knows-maybe her face! [fleeing] Maybe she's not as great as she claims to be-where are her youtube performances! Regards, Lenmaestrob wrote:All of them are true. I stand by the one that says the Chatterbox is sacred ground, and that while AL may be just letting off steam, the steam belongs elsewhere, not here.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests