NYTimes Article Anton Reicha

Your 'hot spot' for all classical music subjects. Non-classical music subjects are to be posted in the Corner Pub.

Moderators: Lance, Corlyss_D

Post Reply
Posts: 14492
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 9:28 pm
Location: new york city

NYTimes Article Anton Reicha

Post by lennygoran » Sat Sep 08, 2018 5:46 am

Have to admit I never heard of this guy. There are clips at the NYTimes site.Regards, Len

A Friend of Beethoven, Now Rediscovered in His Own Right

By Corinna da Fonseca-Wollheim

Sept. 7, 2018

Until recently, the place you’d be most likely to encounter the name Anton Reicha was in the footnotes of books about Beethoven. The two met as teenagers when they played in the same orchestra in Bonn, Germany: Reicha as second flute, Beethoven on viola. Reicha’s name also pops up in the biographies of composers who studied counterpoint with him at the Paris Conservatory: Berlioz, Liszt, Franck, Gounod.

But an ambitious recording project by the American-Serbian pianist Ivan Ilic suggests it’s time to finally give Reicha’s music a listen. This week brings the release of the second in a planned five-disc series, accompanied by documentary videos posted online. The Chamber Music Society of Lincoln Center will include works by Reicha in two programs in November. But it’s particularly in the piano music of Reicha, who was born in Prague in 1770 and died in Paris in 1836, that Mr. Ilic sees affinities with some idiosyncratic figures of 20th-century music. In an interview ahead of a recital in Hamburg, he said Reicha’s music was “eccentric and esoteric. He was big on imagining different possibilities.”

Some of Reicha’s most outré ideas were confined to his imagination. After unsuccessful attempts to make it as an opera composer, he focused on teaching and writing theoretical treatises. In these, he advocated for quarter tones and dreamed up a double concerto for two soloists playing in different keys — a century before Ives. He questioned the convention of the time that confined musical statements or phrases to four measures, arguing that listeners were perfectly capable of absorbing ideas that took five or six bars to express.

And long before Bartok, he wrote music in compound meter, overthrowing the tradition that subdivided musical time into multiples of twos and threes. One such fugue, written in 1803 in the knock-knee time signature of 5/8, will appear on Mr. Ilic’s third Reicha disc next year.

“I was fascinated by the way he broke the rules,” Mr. Ilic said. “He has a musical style that’s pretty close to Haydn in terms of the surface, but then he modulates in really weird ways and it’s in 5/8.”

What’s especially strange about Reicha is that this unconventional streak was embedded in a sober, even pedantic personality and a compositional work ethic rooted in the past. His voluminous writings for solo piano — Mr. Ilic estimates that his five albums will cover about a third of the output — are related in spirit to those of Bach. Fugues were an obsession.

As a theorist, Reicha was driven by a desire to bring the same structure and logic to music education that he saw in other sciences. Louise Bernard de Raymond, a musicologist in Paris, said in a phone interview that in Reicha’s work “there is also the desire to understand music through other fields: mathematics, Kantian philosophy. There is a general desire to forge a form of musical education that is systematic and rational — a belief in progress.”

To his students, Reicha appears to have been a wonderfully open-minded teacher. “Nothing offends him,” Gounod wrote in his memoirs, “everything amuses him; everything is of interest; and what I like best about him is that he always wants to know why.”

Sometimes the quirkiness of Reicha’s mind is strikingly audible, as in a Chaplinesque fugue (Op. 36, No. 12) that, in the space of just over a minute, starts in A and skips through five other keys before landing, incongruously, in G.

Harmonic oddities are often hidden inside pieces of easy, approachable charm. The first track of Mr. Ilic’s first disc, from the collection “Practical Examples,” sounds a bit like Haydn walking arm-in-arm with Philip Glass.

A dreamy, shy étude seems to sleepwalk through remote keys.
Ivan Ilić plays Antoine Reicha's Etude no 1CreditCreditVideo by IvanCDGvideos

Mr. Ilic, who studied mathematics and music at the University of California at Berkeley, said he was fascinated by the empirical way in which Reicha isolated and questioned different elements of music. “That seemed to me really close to the music I was obsessed with at that moment, which was Morton Feldman and the New York School,” he said.

This pianist is taking a gamble by devoting a sizable chunk of his career to a largely unknown composer. But, he said, “I just need this music right now. And I need to connect with people who get this music: the humor, the stops and starts, the way that he’s winking at the audience all the time with respect to what expectations are.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/07/arts ... hoven.html

John F
Posts: 20347
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 4:41 am
Location: Brooklyn, NY

Re: NYTimes Article Anton Reicha

Post by John F » Sat Sep 08, 2018 6:22 am

Reicha wrote some music of remarkable originality, as Wollheim says. But he's hardly been relegated to footnotes. There are dozens of CDs of his music; one project aimed to record all of his wind quintets, of which he composed a great many. The Kleinmeister of the late 18th and early 19th century weren't always so klein; I explored them in depth some years ago and came up with many works that deserve performance and recording by major soloists and ensembles. (Our Ralph Stein was a Dittersdorf enthusiast and he wasn't joking, not entirely anyway.) I don't know Reicha's piano music at all, and it's pleasing that he's getting a few column inches in the NY Times.
John Francis

Posts: 14492
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 9:28 pm
Location: new york city

Re: NYTimes Article Anton Reicha

Post by lennygoran » Sat Sep 08, 2018 6:30 am

John F wrote:
Sat Sep 08, 2018 6:22 am
Reicha wrote some music of remarkable originality, as Wollheim says.
Thanks, I'm big on symphonies and am starting with his Anton Reicha - Symphony No.3 in F-major (1808)-you tube comes through! Regards, Len :lol:

Site Administrator
Posts: 17973
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 1:27 am
Location: Binghamton, New York

Re: NYTimes Article Anton Reicha

Post by Lance » Sat Sep 08, 2018 10:33 am

I have quite of few CDs of Reicha's music but hate to admit he doesn't fall into my regular listening habits; I don't know why. Perhaps I shall pick him up again!

I can recommend a 3-CD set on the Alpha label [369] that contains a piano trio, trios for three celli, piano sonatas and other works performed by outstanding artists such as Bylsma, Neidich, L'Archibudlli, etc. We live in a great time when even composers of that period never knew about much of this music composed b their contemporaries. We have so much at our fingertips!
Lance G. Hill

When she started to play, Mr. Steinway came down and personally
rubbed his name off the piano. [Speaking about pianist &*$#@+#]


Posts: 6009
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 11:30 am

Re: NYTimes Article Anton Reicha

Post by maestrob » Sat Sep 08, 2018 11:58 am

I have a few Reicha discs in my collection, but haven't listened to them in more than a decade. This thread prompts me to play them, so thanks Len. :)

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], maestrob, Majestic-12 [Bot] and 31 guests