Pelleas Review

Your 'hot spot' for all classical music subjects. Non-classical music subjects are to be posted in the Corner Pub.

Moderators: Lance, Corlyss_D

Post Reply
lennygoran
Posts: 19347
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 9:28 pm
Location: new york city

Pelleas Review

Post by lennygoran » Sat Jan 19, 2019 7:58 am

Image

Image

I'd go to see Pelleas again but it would have to be with another production-I don't like this one-Jonathan Miller’s 1995 production, which metaphorically sets the story of an ill-fated family in a Gothic 19th-century castle. There are audio clips at the site if the NYTimes lets you in.

Review: In ‘Pelléas,’ the Met Opera’s Music Director Takes Charge

By Anthony Tommasini

Jan. 16, 2019

Yannick Nézet-Séguin, the new music director of the Metropolitan Opera, may not have many appearances with the company this season. But conducting the opening of Debussy’s “Pelléas et Mélisande” on Tuesday night, he seemed fully in charge.

The 43-year-old conductor captured the hushed eeriness of the work’s first few measures, in which the orchestra suggests the somber, mysterious mood that pervades the entire opera. But that’s not all.

What also came through immediately was that, still fresh in his new role at the Met, Mr. Nézet-Séguin has arrived with bold interpretive ideas and the determination to carry them out. He took a daringly slow tempo in this opening passage, a solemn, low theme in chords that hints at modal plainchant. The restrained sound of the strings was deep and dark, yet resonant and slightly tremulous. The theme that immediately follows — a nervous, oscillating two-note motif — was all the more ominous for his subdued, weighty rendering.


Throughout this long work, Mr. Nézet-Séguin conveyed the subliminal intensity that courses through even the most seemingly languid and diaphanous passages. The fraught eruptions had shattering impact. During whole stretches, the orchestra enshrouds the vocal lines with sonorities that give lift and clarity to the sung words, while tapping into the psychological undertow of the emotions. All this came through in the performances Mr. Nézet-Séguin drew from the inspired orchestra and admirable cast.

In a revealing interview with The New York Times published this week, Mr. Nézet-Séguin said that the “basic presence of the orchestral sound” at the Met is not exactly what he imagines it could be. With his elegant, vibrant performances of Verdi’s “La Traviata” in December, he worked to bring out what he called a richer, more resonant and bass-oriented sound.

Though his comments were a little vague, what he is describing generally characterized this “Pelléas.” He emphasized the Wagnerian elements that seeped into Debussy’s score, especially with the orchestra’s deep-set, warm sound — which did seem different from the lighter textures favored by his predecessor, James Levine. (Mr. Levine was fired last year over allegations of sexual misconduct, which he has denied.) Yet, the weightiness was balanced by French-styled radiance in the opera’s many iridescent passages.


This “Pelléas” is the first revival in nearly a decade of Jonathan Miller’s 1995 production, which metaphorically sets the story of an ill-fated family in a Gothic 19th-century castle where outdoor forests and chalky inner sanctums seem to merge. The sense of doom that runs through this opera, with a libretto Debussy adapted from Maeterlinck’s Symbolist play, came through in the opening scene between Prince Golaud, a grandson of King Arkel of Allemonde, and Mélisande, the frightened, secretive young woman Golaud encounters weeping by a fountain in the forest. The bass-baritone Kyle Ketelsen commanded the stage as Golaud, his voice robust and strong, yet grave.

A lonely widower, Golaud is at once drawn to and protective of Mélisande. He knows not to press her immediately with questions about where she has come from, who has harmed her, and how. The mezzo-soprano Isabel Leonard brought a melting sound to Mélisande while suggesting the character’s fears and volatility. Yet, she intriguingly tapped into this fragile young woman’s willfulness. After all, it takes control to maintain secrets (and to downright lie) as Mélisande does. You understand why she almost passively, as we soon learn, marries Golaud. What other course is there? In a way, what does it matter?


The tenor Paul Appleby brought youthful impulsiveness and sweetness to Pelléas, Golaud’s impressionable younger half brother, who falls uncontrollably in love with Mélisande. But on Tuesday, he seemed vocally underpowered, especially in his lower register. The role has been sung both by light baritones and tenors. Mr. Appleby’s voice had more presence when the music took him into his bright, upper range.

The veteran bass Ferruccio Furlanetto, singing with earthy sound and aching sadness, was magnificent as the old, nearly-blind Arkel, who seems to accept that all people, even the members of his sullen family, are guided by fates we can only guess at. The plush-voiced contralto Marie-Nicole Lemieux had a notable Met debut in the small but crucial role of Geneviève, the wistful mother to both Golaud and Pelléas. A. Jesse Schopflocher, an impressive treble, made an endearing Yniold, Golaud’s young son, who is baffled by the adults and turns fearful when his father is seized with violent jealousy of his wife.

Alas, there are only four remaining performances, with Mr. Nézet-Séguin conducting just three. It will take time for him to fill out his schedule at the Met. But it’s worth the wait.



https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/16/arts ... pe=Article

John F
Posts: 21076
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 4:41 am
Location: Brooklyn, NY

Re: Pelleas Review

Post by John F » Sat Jan 19, 2019 10:34 am

I've seen many performances of this opera at the Met, the great ones conducted by James Levine with world-best casts and a good one led by Simon Rattle. In comparison this cast is unimpressive on paper - it's to be broadcast this afternoon.

P.S. After half an hour I've heard enough. None of the singers is making an impression as their characters (two have been announced as having colds), but the main problem is Nézet-Séguin's conducting. As Tommasini says, he makes it sound like Wagner, specifically "Parsifal" as conducted by Knappertsbusch: slow and heavy. I love this opera too much to put up with four hours of this.
John Francis

Beckmesser
Posts: 499
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 12:11 pm
Location: Columbia/Westchester Counties NY

Re: Pelleas Review

Post by Beckmesser » Sun Jan 20, 2019 11:26 am

While I am very fond of Debussy's music I have never been able to appreciate his only opera. The fault, I'm sure, is mine because professional musicians and knowledgeable music lovers hold the work in such high esteem.

I'm not exactly sure what my blind spot is, but I think it is the dramatic element which doesn't interest me at all. Is it the case that Debussy's music serves the drama rather than the other way around (as in most operas)? Maybe it would help if I could speak French.

I only know that every performance I have attended has induced sleep.

maestrob
Posts: 18925
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 11:30 am

Re: Pelleas Review

Post by maestrob » Sun Jan 20, 2019 11:41 am

Beckmesser wrote:
Sun Jan 20, 2019 11:26 am
While I am very fond of Debussy's music I have never been able to appreciate his only opera. The fault, I'm sure, is mine because professional musicians and knowledgeable music lovers hold the work in such high esteem.

I'm not exactly sure what my blind spot is, but I think it is the dramatic element which doesn't interest me at all. Is it the case that Debussy's music serves the drama rather than the other way around (as in most operas)? Maybe it would help if I could speak French.

I only know that every performance I have attended has induced sleep.
Interesting. I have the same problem. As much as I admire Toscanini, who did conduct the piece, I have not been throughout my life, able to enjoy Debussy's attempt at opera, even though I like and admire his "Martyr de St. Sebastien" since my teens. However, the failing is mine, I'm sure, since Pelleas pops up now and then led by many conductors I respect.

Having a degree in Modern Languages from Villanova (French major, Russian minor) and being licensed to teach K-12 in all 50 states doesn't help me, I'm sad to say.

Soit! (So be it!) :roll:

John F
Posts: 21076
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 4:41 am
Location: Brooklyn, NY

Re: Pelleas Review

Post by John F » Sun Jan 20, 2019 1:14 pm

There's a rather strange mismatch between the plot, which is not unlike "Cavalleria Rusticana" and other verismo melodramas, and Maeterlinck's emphasis on fate and associated symbolism. Debussy's music fits the latter somewhat better than the former.

Yet I find myself emotionally involved in some of the scenes, including all of Act 5 with the dying Mélisande. The conclusion, after Arkel's "Now, in her place, it's the turn of the poor little one," referring to Mélisande's baby, beginning at 22:40, with Mélisande's theme one last time in the muted trumpet, can move me deeply.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTaKakgqCYY
John Francis

jserraglio
Posts: 11954
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 7:06 am
Location: Cleveland, Ohio

Re: Pelleas Review

Post by jserraglio » Mon Jan 21, 2019 9:46 am

Listening now. It sounds just fine to me. Sometimes newer suits well.

Love this opera (and Dialogues des carmélites) so much the three hours is winging by ....
_____________________________________________

Debussy - PELLEAS ET MELISANDE
New York, Saturday January 19th, 2019

Mélisande - Isabel Leonard
Pelléas - Paul Appleby
Geneviève - Marie-Nicole Lemieux
Golaud - Kyle Ketelsen
Arkel - Ferruccio Furlanetto
Yniold - Lucas Mann

A physican - Paul Corona
A shepherd - Jeremy Galyon

Chorus and orchestra of the Metropolitan Opera
Leitung: Yannick Nézet-Séguin

Broadcast Hessen-Radio (HR 2)
Last edited by jserraglio on Mon Jan 21, 2019 10:02 am, edited 1 time in total.

lennygoran
Posts: 19347
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 9:28 pm
Location: new york city

Re: Pelleas Review

Post by lennygoran » Mon Jan 21, 2019 10:01 am

John F wrote:
Sun Jan 20, 2019 1:14 pm
There's a rather strange mismatch between the plot, which is not unlike "Cavalleria Rusticana" and other verismo melodramas, and Maeterlinck's emphasis on fate and associated symbolism. Debussy's music fits the latter somewhat better than the former.
John in the years I was struggling to appreciate this piece I was making random notes and my file has this. Regards, Len

January 8, 1983
OPERA: 'PELLEAS ET M'ELISANDE' AT MET
By DONAL HENAHAN
Debussy's ''Pelleas et Melisande'' is a most unoperatic opera. Its leading characters find it terribly difficult to say what they mean, not so much because they want to be subtle or to talk in poetic circumlocutions as because they are inarticulate, frightened or confused. In other words, they speak and act pretty much the way you and I and people we meet every day speak, not the way heroes and villains of a child's fairy-tale world speak. They do not sing arias when they are happy, nor do they gather at the footlights in groups to vow vengeance when they are angry. In this sense, ''Pelleas'' is one of the most naturalistic operas ever written, though it wraps the fact in gauze.

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.h ... A965958260
Debussy instructed the first-night cast to forget they were singing, so clearly did he want the rising and falling pitches to imitate the intonations of ordinary speech.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests