Review: Mozart’s Requiem Gets a Fresh Spin at the Philharmonic

Your 'hot spot' for all classical music subjects. Non-classical music subjects are to be posted in the Corner Pub.

Moderators: Lance, Corlyss_D

Post Reply
lennygoran
Posts: 14569
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 9:28 pm
Location: new york city

Review: Mozart’s Requiem Gets a Fresh Spin at the Philharmonic

Post by lennygoran » Fri Mar 15, 2019 7:00 am

Image


Review: Mozart’s Requiem Gets a Fresh Spin at the Philharmonic

By Joshua Barone

March 14, 2019

If you want to see how an orchestra can give a fresh polish to dusty old Mozart, head to Lincoln Center.

There you’ll find a surprisingly novel Mozart program — played by the New York Philharmonic on Wednesday night under Manfred Honeck and continuing through Tuesday — that, like a fugue, tells a story of the composer’s final year while mapping a journey of death and transcendence.

Unlike Schubert, whose later works have an autumnal mood colored by sickness and melancholy, Mozart didn’t begin the year 1791 knowing that, months after his 35th birthday, he would fall ill and die soon after, on Dec. 5. So you would be hard-pressed to find a sense of farewell in his music from that time.

In fact, for most of the year Mozart was as stylistically nimble and prolific as ever. He presented the premieres of not one, but two operas, “La Clemenza di Tito” and “Die Zauberflöte.” And, in what would be his final public appearance as a pianist, he gave the first performance of his Piano Concerto No. 27 in B flat, which the Philharmonic opened its program with on Wednesday, featuring Richard Goode.

This gently dignified piece, with childlike simplicity and few extremes, all but dares its soloist to achieve majesty at a whisper, to only suggest virtuosity. Mr. Goode, an elder statesman of Mozart’s music, was calmly authoritative, gliding through quick runs and playing with restrained lyricism. Even his galloping rhythms had an unpretentious lightness, more like a pony than a Clydesdale.

He didn’t perform an encore, which only heightened the contrast between the rosy concerto, a triumph of early 1791, and what followed after intermission: the Requiem, left unfinished at Mozart’s death.


Mr. Honeck, who as the Pittsburgh Symphony Orchestra’s music director has repeatedly found original ways to present the Requiem there, opted this week for a programmatic medley: “Masonic Funeral Music,” the Requiem and “Ave Verum Corpus,” played without pause for a loose narrative about, as one of the texts says, “a foretaste of heaven in death’s agony.”

“Masonic Funeral Music” is the program’s exception, the one work not from 1791. (It was written in 1785.) But listen closely and you’ll hear eerie similarities with the Requiem. Like that piece, its orchestration calls for basset horns and leans heavily on the lower strings, setting a richly somber tone that conjures an organ-like timbre. Mozart never meant for it to be an overture for the Requiem, but on Wednesday the juxtaposition was seamless.

And this move — adding a prologue to the Requiem, with an epilogue on the way — was hardly as unusual as Mr. Honeck’s presentation of the Requiem itself. After Mozart’s death, the work was completed by his pupil Franz Xaver Süssmayr, whose edition was long the standard for orchestras around the world.

The problem often is that it’s all too easy to tell where Mozart’s sophistication ends and Süssmayr’s well-intended inferiority begins. Mr. Honeck’s solution is to cut the final sections and present the Requiem as Mozart left it — almost.

His version begins with the seven completed sections, followed by the Lacrimosa and Offertorium composed by Mozart but finished by Süssmayr. Then it ends with the Lacrimosa — though now as only Mozart’s fragment, the last eight measures of music he ever wrote. Further complicating things, Mr. Honeck, according to the Philharmonic, also has his own changes to the Süssmayr orchestrations.

I may be overstating this Requiem’s complexity. In the concert hall, it was natural and succinct, never losing steam as the work often does. And the Westminster Symphonic Choir was stirring in the choral passages, with stabbing staccatos in the Dies Irae and glorious radiance in the Rex Tremendae. The four soloists each had distinctive qualities — standouts were the tenor Ben Bliss, who brought the dramatic textures you might hear in his Mozart over at the Metropolitan Opera, and Megan Mikailovna Samarin, making her Philharmonic debut with a penetrating mezzo-soprano — yet they blended with impressive grace.

Mr. Honeck could have let the concert evaporate into mysterious quiet with the Lacrimosa; but, by ending with “Ave Verum Corpus,” the famously spiritual conductor seemed to be making a statement. If the Requiem is a plea for eternal rest, then this brief work, played on Wednesday with a soft glow, promises that and more: serene transcendence.


https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/14/arts ... tion=Music

John F
Posts: 20453
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 4:41 am
Location: Brooklyn, NY

Re: Review: Mozart’s Requiem Gets a Fresh Spin at the Philharmonic

Post by John F » Fri Mar 15, 2019 10:02 am

Joshua Barone is a new name for me, though the Times says he's been on their staff for five years. I'm not impressed. "Dusty old Mozart"? "Like a fugue, tells a story"? Sheesh!
John Francis

maestrob
Posts: 6108
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 11:30 am

Re: Review: Mozart’s Requiem Gets a Fresh Spin at the Philharmonic

Post by maestrob » Fri Mar 15, 2019 10:24 am

Been a fan of most of Honeck's work with his recordings with Pittsburg and other orchestras for some time now. His disc of Strauss orchestral excerpts issued last year was one of the best interpretations I've heard in a long time, while his live Tchaikovsky V was exceedingly eccentric. I'm glad he got a good review for this concert. The Ave Verum is one of Mozart's most beautiful pieces.

lennygoran
Posts: 14569
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 9:28 pm
Location: new york city

Re: Review: Mozart’s Requiem Gets a Fresh Spin at the Philharmonic

Post by lennygoran » Sat Mar 16, 2019 5:14 am

John F wrote:
Fri Mar 15, 2019 10:02 am
Joshua Barone is a new name for me, though the Times says he's been on their staff for five years.
John not a new name for me-I've seen his reviews in the NYTimes for sometime now. Regards, Len


Search found 37 matches: joshua Barone

search.php?keywords=joshua+Barone
You alerted us to an article he wrote on Oct 2016


by John F
Sat Oct 01, 2016 12:29 pm
Forum: Corner Pub
Topic: A hip-hop archive at the library
Replies: 0
Views: 1325

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider] and 19 guests