'A two-track presidency' — Times takes extraordinary step of publishing op-ed by Anonymous

Discuss whatever you want here ... movies, books, recipes, politics, beer, wine, TV ... everything except classical music.

Moderators: Lance, Corlyss_D

Post Reply
jserraglio
Posts: 4796
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 7:06 am
Location: Cleveland, Ohio

'A two-track presidency' — Times takes extraordinary step of publishing op-ed by Anonymous

Post by jserraglio » Wed Sep 05, 2018 4:31 pm

NY Times Op-Ed

I work for the president but like-minded colleagues and I have vowed to thwart parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations.

The Times today is taking the rare step of publishing an anonymous Op-Ed essay. We have done so at the request of the author, a senior official in the Trump administration whose identity is known to us and whose job would be jeopardized by its disclosure. We believe publishing this essay anonymously is the only way to deliver acTimes or our vetting process here.

President Trump is facing a test to his presidency unlike any faced by a modern American leader.

It’s not just that the special counsel looms large. Or that the country is bitterly divided over Mr. Trump’s leadership. Or even that his party might well lose the House to an opposition hellbent on his downfall.

The dilemma — which he does not fully grasp — is that many of the senior officials in his own administration are working diligently from within to frustrate parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations.

I would know. I am one of them.

To be clear, ours is not the popular “resistance” of the left. We want the administration to succeed and think that many of its policies have already made America safer and more prosperous.

But we believe our first duty is to this country, and the president continues to act in a manner that is detrimental to the health of our republic.

That is why many Trump appointees have vowed to do what we can to preserve our democratic institutions while thwarting Mr. Trump’s more misguided impulses until he is out of office.

The root of the problem is the president’s amorality. Anyone who works with him knows he is not moored to any discernible first principles that guide his decision making.

Although he was elected as a Republican, the president shows little affinity for ideals long espoused by conservatives: free minds, free markets and free people. At best, he has invoked these ideals in scripted settings. At worst, he has attacked them outright.

In addition to his mass-marketing of the notion that the press is the “enemy of the people,” President Trump’s impulses are generally anti-trade and anti-democratic.

Don’t get me wrong. There are bright spots that the near-ceaseless negative coverage of the administration fails to capture: effective deregulation, historic tax reform, a more robust military and more.

But these successes have come despite — not because of — the president’s leadership style, which is impetuous, adversarial, petty and ineffective.

From the White House to executive branch departments and agencies, senior officials will privately admit their daily disbelief at the commander in chief’s comments and actions. Most are working to insulate their operations from his whims.

Meetings with him veer off topic and off the rails, he engages in repetitive rants, and his impulsiveness results in half-baked, ill-informed and occasionally reckless decisions that have to be walked back.

“There is literally no telling whether he might change his mind from one minute to the next,” a top official complained to me recently, exasperated by an Oval Office meeting at which the president flip-flopped on a major policy decision he’d made only a week earlier.

The erratic behavior would be more concerning if it weren’t for unsung heroes in and around the White House. Some of his aides have been cast as villains by the media. But in private, they have gone to great lengths to keep bad decisions contained to the West Wing, though they are clearly not always successful.

It may be cold comfort in this chaotic era, but Americans should know that there are adults in the room. We fully recognize what is happening. And we are trying to do what’s right even when Donald Trump won’t.

The result is a two-track presidency.

Take foreign policy: In public and in private, President Trump shows a preference for autocrats and dictators, such as President Vladimir Putin of Russia and North Korea’s leader, Kim Jong-un, and displays little genuine appreciation for the ties that bind us to allied, like-minded nations.

Astute observers have noted, though, that the rest of the administration is operating on another track, one where countries like Russia are called out for meddling and punished accordingly, and where allies around the world are engaged as peers rather than ridiculed as rivals.

On Russia, for instance, the president was reluctant to expel so many of Mr. Putin’s spies as punishment for the poisoning of a former Russian spy in Britain. He complained for weeks about senior staff members letting him get boxed into further confrontation with Russia, and he expressed frustration that the United States continued to impose sanctions on the country for its malign behavior. But his national security team knew better — such actions had to be taken, to hold Moscow accountable.

This isn’t the work of the so-called deep state. It’s the work of the steady state.

Given the instability many witnessed, there were early whispers within the cabinet of invoking the 25th Amendment, which would start a complex process for removing the president. But no one wanted to precipitate a constitutional crisis. So we will do what we can to steer the administration in the right direction until — one way or another — it’s over.

The bigger concern is not what Mr. Trump has done to the presidency but rather what we as a nation have allowed him to do to us. We have sunk low with him and allowed our discourse to be stripped of civility.

Senator John McCain put it best in his farewell letter. All Americans should heed his words and break free of the tribalism trap, with the high aim of uniting through our shared values and love of this great nation.

We may no longer have Senator McCain. But we will always have his example — a lodestar for restoring honor to public life and our national dialogue. Mr. Trump may fear such honorable men, but we should revere them.

There is a quiet resistance within the administration of people choosing to put country first. But the real difference will be made by everyday citizens rising above politics, reaching across the aisle and resolving to shed the labels in favor of a single one: Americans.

The writer is a senior official in the Trump administration.
.

AlanM
Posts: 64
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 4:37 pm

Re: 'A two-track presidency' — Times takes extraordinary step of publishing op-ed by Anonymous

Post by AlanM » Wed Sep 05, 2018 7:32 pm

Does “publishing” just refer to the digital version? Will the hard copy appear tomorrow? How language seems to change so rapidly.

jserraglio
Posts: 4796
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 7:06 am
Location: Cleveland, Ohio

Re: 'A two-track presidency' — Times takes extraordinary step of publishing op-ed by Anonymous

Post by jserraglio » Wed Sep 05, 2018 10:01 pm

AlanM wrote:
Wed Sep 05, 2018 7:32 pm
Does “publishing” just refer to the digital version? Will the hard copy appear tomorrow? How language seems to change so rapidly.
The word "publishing", be it digital or print or both, hasn't changed its meaning; whereas the meaning in American English of the words "Presidency of the United States" has been rapidly changed, and not for the better, by the shocking mental unfitness of the “fifth- or sixth-grader” (as Defense Sec'y James Mattis reportedly called him) that currently occupies that office. Many months ago,Senator Corker compared the WH to a day-care center for a willful adult. In retrospect, Corker understated the true state of affairs: it's day-care for an adult to be sure, but one with the mental acumen of a bratty toddler.

BTW, this op ed did appear in print: page A23 of the Sept 6 edition.

Nevertheless, for a reputable newspaper, let alone the greatest paper on the planet, to publish an opinion piece this explosive anonymously is astounding. Extraordinary circumstances, extraordinary measures.
Last edited by jserraglio on Fri Sep 07, 2018 9:42 am, edited 4 times in total.

lennygoran
Posts: 14061
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 9:28 pm
Location: new york city

Re: 'A two-track presidency' — Times takes extraordinary step of publishing op-ed by Anonymous

Post by lennygoran » Thu Sep 06, 2018 5:25 am

Lawrence O'Donnell guessed it's Coates-his guess makes sense to me. Regards, Len
PS-as Don Jr might say-Love It! :lol: :lol: :lol:

https://twitter.com/Lawrence/status/1037554749086859264

jserraglio
Posts: 4796
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 7:06 am
Location: Cleveland, Ohio

Re: 'A two-track presidency' — Times takes extraordinary step of publishing op-ed by Anonymous

Post by jserraglio » Thu Sep 06, 2018 6:06 am

lennygoran wrote:
Thu Sep 06, 2018 5:25 am
Lawrence O'Donnell guessed it's Coates-his guess makes sense to me. Regards, Len
PS-as Don Jr might say-Love It!
Former GOP National Chairman Michael Steele suggested it might be Donald Trump himself, a man who touts his U. Penn pedigree and pokes fun at those like Jeff Sessions who lack similar Ivy-League credentials.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests