“Human life cannot be wrongfully destroyed without incurring the wrath of a holy God,” zany Alabama SC chief thunders

Discuss whatever you want here ... movies, books, recipes, politics, beer, wine, TV ... everything except classical music.

Moderators: Lance, Corlyss_D

Post Reply
jserraglio
Posts: 11954
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 7:06 am
Location: Cleveland, Ohio

“Human life cannot be wrongfully destroyed without incurring the wrath of a holy God,” zany Alabama SC chief thunders

Post by jserraglio » Fri Feb 23, 2024 3:15 pm

The Alabama Chief Justice Who Invoked God in Deciding the Embryo Case

Image

Chief Justice Tom Parker has long been revered by conservative groups as an architect for the overturning of Roe v. Wade.

New York Times
By Rick Rojas
Reporting from Atlanta
Feb. 22, 2024

In an Alabama Supreme Court decision that has rattled reproductive medicine across the country, a majority of the justices said the law was clear that frozen embryos should be considered children: “Unborn children are ‘children.’”

But the court’s chief justice, Tom Parker, drew on more than the Constitution and legal precedent to explain his determination.

“Human life cannot be wrongfully destroyed without incurring the wrath of a holy God,” he wrote in a concurring opinion that invoked the Book of Genesis and the prophet Jeremiah and quoted at length from the writings of 16th- and 17th-century theologians.

“Even before birth,” he added, “all human beings have the image of God, and their lives cannot be destroyed without effacing his glory.”

Just as the case, which centers on wrongful-death claims for frozen embryos that were destroyed in a mishap at a fertility clinic, has reverberated beyond Alabama, so has Justice Parker’s opinion.

His theological digressions showed why he has long been revered by conservative legal groups and anti-abortion activists, and also why he has inspired apprehension among critics who regard him as guided more by religious doctrine than the law.

In a post on social media, Tony Perkins, the president of the conservative Family Research Council, described the opinion as a “beautiful defense of life and the Alabama Constitution.” But critics viewed it as dangerous and deviating from the U.S. Constitution. “Welcome to the theocracy,” wrote a columnist for The Washington Post.

Either way, the opinion was true to form for Justice Parker.

Since he was first elected to the nine-member court in 2004, and in his legal career before it, he has shown no reticence about expressing how his Christian beliefs have profoundly shaped his understanding of the law and his approach to it as a lawyer and judge.

Those beliefs also informed a vision that, his supporters say, made him a dogged and brilliant architect for laying the groundwork that contributed to the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in 2022 to overturn a federal right to abortion with Dobbs v. Jackson.

In 2022, Matt Clark, the president of the Alabama Center for Law and Liberty, a conservative legal advocacy group, praised Justice Parker for his “courage and relentlessness.” He cited Justice Parker’s writing in past cases as scaffolding for the arguments that successfully challenged Roe v. Wade, which established a constitutional right to abortion and blocks states from banning the procedure before fetal viability, which most experts estimate at about 23 or 24 weeks.

”He picked apart Roe’s logic when it came to viability,” Mr. Clark wrote in an essay published by 1819 News, a conservative digital outlet in Alabama, referring to a concurring opinion in a case related to a wrongful-death lawsuit involving a fetus that was lost before it had reached the point of viability outside the womb.

“Fast-forward nine years later,” Mr. Clark, who later joined Justice Parker’s staff, wrote. “When Mississippi asked the Supreme Court to take Dobbs, one of its major points was how Roe’s viability standard didn’t make any sense. And whose writing did Mississippi draw on multiple times to make that point?”

His sharpest critics have not denied his influence. “What Justice Parker has done is explicitly lay out the road map for overturning Roe v. Wade,” said Lynn Paltrow, the founder and former executive director of the nonprofit Pregnancy Justice, according to an extensive investigation of Justice Parker’s role in the so-called personhood movement that was published by ProPublica and The New Republic in 2014.

Before joining the court, Justice Parker was the founding executive director of the Alabama Family Alliance, a conservative advocacy group now called the Alabama Policy Institute. He had also served as an assistant state attorney general to Jeff Sessions, who later became a U.S. senator and former President Donald J. Trump’s attorney general.

He was also a close aide and ally of Roy Moore, the former chief justice of the State Supreme Court who was twice removed from the job — first for dismissing a federal court order to remove an enormous granite monument of the Ten Commandments he had installed in the state judicial building, and then for ordering state judges to defy the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision affirming gay marriage.

Justice Parker, who became chief justice in 2019, is now in his final term on the Supreme Court, having reached the court’s mandatory retirement age of 70.

The 8-to-1 decision last week by the justices, all of whom are Republicans, overturned a lower court’s ruling that frozen embryos were not considered children. The justices found that the couples could pursue a wrongful-death lawsuit against a Mobile fertility clinic over a 2020 episode in which a hospital patient removed frozen embryos from tanks of liquid nitrogen and dropped them on the floor.

Critics argued that the decision stood to have far-reaching consequences. “Justices have crossed a critical boundary to assign personhood to something created in a lab that exists outside of a human body,” the American Civil Liberties Union of Alabama said in a statement.

The majority, in its opinion, cited a 1872 statute that allows parents to sue over the wrongful death of a child and found that “unborn children,” including “extrauterine children,” were included in that.

In his concurring opinion, Justice Parker reached further back, citing Genesis: “The principle itself — that human life is fundamentally distinct from other forms of life and cannot be taken intentionally without justification — has deep roots that reach back to the creation of man ‘in the image of God.’”

It underscored the philosophy that has guided him through two decades on the court.

“When judges don’t rule in the fear of the Lord, everything’s falling apart,” he once wrote, citing the Book of Psalms, according to the ProPublica investigation. “The whole world is coming unglued.”

Rach3
Posts: 9210
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2018 9:17 am

Re: “Human life cannot be wrongfully destroyed without incurring the wrath of a holy God,” zany Alabama SC chief thunder

Post by Rach3 » Fri Feb 23, 2024 4:41 pm

An extremist evangelical preacher , theocrat, and political hack , not a jurist, reminding one of the "judges" of the Inquisition and Salem trials.

The Court could easily , and judiciously , have decided the statute and amendment and case law were unclear and that further legislative clarification was needed,thus dismissing the suit. Instead , the Court held the law was clear, which the law clearly is not. Proof of that lack of clarity and that the Court's ruling is disingenuous is the reaction by the Alabama GOP which is now scurrying about to get a law passed to preserve IVF in Alabama, but it may be too late, the damage to couples, providers and the State done.Last person to leave Alabama need not turn out the lights; none are on.

What can legally be done with embryos that are never used ? Can the "parents " decide to kill their "children"?

jserraglio
Posts: 11954
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 7:06 am
Location: Cleveland, Ohio

Re: “Human life cannot be wrongfully destroyed without incurring the wrath of a holy God,” zany Alabama SC chief thunder

Post by jserraglio » Fri Feb 23, 2024 5:20 pm

Alabama’s gov. and lawmakers as well as the national GOP leadership are in a panic, seeking today to nullify this ruling before the horses get out of the barn door. Why? Because they know that voters are gonna send them packing come November.

The New York Times

Alabama Lawmakers Move to Protect I.V.F. Treatments

A court ruling declaring frozen embryos to be legally considered children has set off a scramble among leaders in both parties to preserve access to a crucial reproductive treatment.

Alabama lawmakers are considering legislation that would protect in vitro fertilization, after a State Supreme Court ruling last week led some clinics to halt I.V.F. treatments and left many women in limbo.

The ruling, which declared that frozen embryos should be legally considered children, set off a scramble among leaders in both parties to preserve access to a crucial reproductive treatment for families who have struggled with infertility and for L.G.B.T.Q. couples who are seeking to have children.

The court’s ruling, handed down by an 8-to-1 majority, applies only to three couples who were suing a fertility clinic over the accidental destruction of their embryos. But its wording — paired with a fiery opinion from the chief justice encouraging lawmakers to push its scope further — has left many wondering about the possible wider implications for people seeking I.V.F. treatment.

At least three major fertility clinics in Alabama have halted I.V.F. treatments this week as doctors and lawyers assess the possible consequences of the ruling. On Friday, a major embryo shipping company said that it also was “pausing” its business in Alabama.

And while only Republicans sit on the State Supreme Court, many conservatives in Alabama and across the nation sought to quickly distance themselves from the ruling and any perception that they are out of step with the many Americans who support I.V.F. and access to reproductive medicine.

State Senator Tim Melson, a Republican who has worked as an anesthesiologist and clinical researcher, is planning to introduce a measure that would ensure people can continue to pursue I.V.F. treatment.

Gov. Kay Ivey, a Republican, signaled she would support such a proposal, saying in a statement on Friday that fostering “a culture of life” included helping “couples hoping and praying to be parents who utilize I.V.F.”

Because Republicans hold a supermajority in the State Legislature, their support is essential for any bill to become law.

Democrats have also put forward their own measure. Anthony Daniels, the House minority leader in Alabama, filed a bill on Thursday that says “any fertilized human egg or human embryo that exists outside of a human uterus is not considered an unborn child or human being for any purpose under state law.”

And nationally, the party has not only condemned the ruling, but also tied it directly to the U.S. Supreme Court decision that ended nationwide protections for abortions, a decision that has galvanized women and suburban voters to support Democrats across the country. Republicans have struggled to respond to that political backlash.

The issue could also reverberate in hotly contested congressional races. Mr. Daniels, the House Democratic leader, is one of several lawmakers running for a newly drawn congressional district in Alabama widely viewed as a possible pickup for his party.

But by Friday, it became clear that many Republican leaders, in Alabama and across the country, had little interest in leaving open the possibility that the ruling would jeopardize reproductive access.

Gov. Brian Kemp of Georgia, a Republican, said at the Politico Governors Summit on Thursday that while he was not familiar with the full details of the ruling, he supported I.V.F. treatment because many parents “wouldn’t have children” if it wasn’t for the procedure.

The Senate Republican campaign arm circulated a memo, obtained by The New York Times, that made clear that candidates should “clearly and concisely reject efforts by the government to restrict I.V.F.”

“It is imperative that our candidates align with the public’s overwhelming support for I.V.F. and fertility treatments,” Jason Thielman, the executive director, wrote.


jserraglio
Posts: 11954
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 7:06 am
Location: Cleveland, Ohio

Re: “Human life cannot be wrongfully destroyed without incurring the wrath of a holy God,” zany Alabama SC chief thunder

Post by jserraglio » Fri Feb 23, 2024 6:24 pm

Rach3 wrote:
Fri Feb 23, 2024 6:02 pm
And the National MAGA "rats" scurry from the sinking ship:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/125-house-re ... 38049.html
Or, like cocka-roaches, they run for cover when the lights go on.

david johnson
Posts: 1797
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2005 5:04 am
Location: ark/mo

Re: “Human life cannot be wrongfully destroyed without incurring the wrath of a holy God,” zany Alabama SC chief thunder

Post by david johnson » Sat Feb 24, 2024 5:39 am

I generally support viewing embryos and a fetus as children. I am not convinced about the frozen ones. They will never develop in their frozen state. Other than assuring facilities/personnel are in legal, sanitary condition, and staffed with trained individuals, I think government should stay out of it.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests