Spectator Sport on Roberts Nomination Gets More Interesting

Locked
Ralph
Dittersdorf Specialist & CMG NY Host
Posts: 20996
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 6:54 am
Location: Paradise on Earth, New York, NY

Spectator Sport on Roberts Nomination Gets More Interesting

Post by Ralph » Tue Aug 09, 2005 2:43 pm

Conservative group to oppose John Roberts
8/9/2005, 4:22 p.m. ET
By JESSE J. HOLLAND
The Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — A conservative group in Virginia said Tuesday it would oppose Supreme Court nominee John Roberts' confirmation because of his work helping overturn a Colorado referendum on gays.

The stance by Public Advocate of the United States, which describes itself as a pro-family organization, puts it in opposition to conservative groups that have endorsed Roberts. A number of liberal groups oppose President Bush's nominee.

"The move comes as a result of Roberts' support for the radical homosexual lobby in the 1996 Supreme Court case Romer v. Evans, which overturned a pro-family law passed by the citizens of Colorado in an appalling act of judicial activism," the group said in a news release. It planned a news conference for Wednesday in front of the Supreme Court.

The group's president, Eugene Delgaudio, had said last week that if "Judge Roberts did provide advice on how to overturn this pro-family measure overwhelmingly supported by the people of Colorado, then Public Advocate calls on President Bush to withdraw his nomination of Judge Roberts immediately."

Messages left for Delgaudio seeking comment were not immediately returned on Tuesday.

This is not the first time Delgaudio has gone up against the Bush administration. He criticized Vice President Dick Cheney last year after the vice president, when asked about gay marriage, said, "Freedom means freedom for everyone."

Delgaudio said then: "'Freedom' is not embracing perversion."

The Colorado gay rights case involved Amendment 2, a constitutional amendment approved by voters in 1992 that would have barred laws, ordinances or regulations protecting gays from discrimination by landlords, employers or public agencies such as school districts.

Gay rights groups sued, and the measure was declared unconstitutional in a 6-3 ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1996.

Roberts' role in the case included helping develop a strategy and firing tough questions during a mock court session at Jean Dubofsky, a former Colorado Supreme Court justice who argued the case on behalf of the gay rights plaintiffs.

Other conservative groups, including the Traditional Values Coalition and Focus on the Family Action, the political arm of the Colorado Springs-based conservative Christian ministry Focus on the Family, are still supporting Roberts.

"We support President Bush and his choice for the Supreme Court, John Roberts," said the Rev. Lou Sheldon, founder of the Traditional Values Coalition.

Other groups also are taking public stands on Roberts' candidacy.

NARAL Pro Choice America plans to start running television ads opposing Roberts on Wednesday, and other abortion rights groups including the National Organization for Women, the National Abortion Federation and the Feminist Majority all have announced their opposition to Roberts.

The National Association of Manufacturers, led by Republican John Engler, is expected to announce an endorsement of Roberts on Wednesday.

___

On the Net:

Public Advocate of the United States: http://www.publicadvocateusa.org
Image

"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."

Albert Einstein

Corlyss_D
Site Administrator
Posts: 27663
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 2:25 am
Location: The Great State of Utah
Contact:

Post by Corlyss_D » Tue Aug 09, 2005 8:36 pm

Well, one of them had to take one for the team. It's all kabuki on the conservative side. Maybe on the Dem side too.
Corlyss
Contessa d'EM, a carbon-based life form

Ralph
Dittersdorf Specialist & CMG NY Host
Posts: 20996
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 6:54 am
Location: Paradise on Earth, New York, NY

Post by Ralph » Tue Aug 09, 2005 9:40 pm

Corlyss_D wrote:Well, one of them had to take one for the team. It's all kabuki on the conservative side. Maybe on the Dem side too.
*****

I wonder if Judge Roberts is taking this stuff seriously.
Image

"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."

Albert Einstein

Corlyss_D
Site Administrator
Posts: 27663
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 2:25 am
Location: The Great State of Utah
Contact:

Post by Corlyss_D » Tue Aug 09, 2005 9:48 pm

Ralph wrote:
Corlyss_D wrote:Well, one of them had to take one for the team. It's all kabuki on the conservative side. Maybe on the Dem side too.
*****

I wonder if Judge Roberts is taking this stuff seriously.
Sure! It's bar exam time. He knows he knows enough to practice; but he has to go thru the motions of bar exam to get the piece of paper.
Corlyss
Contessa d'EM, a carbon-based life form

Ralph
Dittersdorf Specialist & CMG NY Host
Posts: 20996
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 6:54 am
Location: Paradise on Earth, New York, NY

Post by Ralph » Tue Aug 09, 2005 10:12 pm

Corlyss_D wrote:
Ralph wrote:
Corlyss_D wrote:Well, one of them had to take one for the team. It's all kabuki on the conservative side. Maybe on the Dem side too.
*****

I wonder if Judge Roberts is taking this stuff seriously.
Sure! It's bar exam time. He knows he knows enough to practice; but he has to go thru the motions of bar exam to get the piece of paper.
*****

But the senators are the bar examiners, not the pundits and hangers-on.
Image

"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."

Albert Einstein

Corlyss_D
Site Administrator
Posts: 27663
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 2:25 am
Location: The Great State of Utah
Contact:

Post by Corlyss_D » Wed Aug 10, 2005 1:57 pm

Ralph wrote:But the senators are the bar examiners, not the pundits and hangers-on.
The interest groups moving out now is known as "providing cover." In addition to whipping up the base and filling the coffers, it gives the senators an opportunity to say "see! I'm only ensuring that this topic of great public concern is addressed by the nominee." That way the Senator don't have to "own" the position.

Let's see. Who's going to raise this for the interest group? My guess is Coburn. That would be a comfortable fit for him. Most of the Republicans would have to hold their noses to raise it and some flat out wouldn't, like Hatch. Coburn won't make much of a deal about it because they want to see Roberts shoot thru the system and there'll be enough whining by the Democrats. Or the issue could just be ignored.
Corlyss
Contessa d'EM, a carbon-based life form

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests