Complete Haydn Symphonies

Posts: 1713
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2003 1:15 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois, United States, North America, Earth, Solar System, Milky Way Galaxy, Universe

Complete Haydn Symphonies

Post by MaestroDJS » Sat Dec 03, 2005 7:38 am

Antal Dórati and the Philharmonica Hungarica recorded the first complete set of Haydn symphonies in the late 1960s and early 1970s on modern instruments for London/Decca, as well as 8 Haydn operas for Philips. Dórati loved Haydn and the results are warm, sympathetic, clear, elegant and first-rate throughout. Clearly this was a labor of love for Dórati. Other conductors may give better performances of individual symphonies or groups of symphonies, but Dórati is consistently excellent. He also takes all the repeats as far as I know, which in my opinion is good in Haydn. These recordings are complemented with annotations are by the most eminent Haydn scholar of the 20th Century: H.C. Robbins Landon. The advantage of the original LPs is the large illustrated format of the booklets, although if my LPs weren't still in great condition after 3 decades I'd be happy to replace them with the CD reissues.

Highly recommended.

The Academy of Ancient Music: 104 reasons why I like Haydn by Bernard Levin
Reprinted from The Times of London, 13 October 1972
The following article was published in The Times on October 13, 1972. It was inspired by the half way mark in Decca’s release of all Haydn’s symphonies by the Philharmonia Hungarica, conducted by Antal Dórati. Decca this month [February 1998], releases the 8th volume of The Academy of Ancient Music’s complete set of the same symphonies, directed by Christopher Hogwood. Being a delightful article, we thought it would be nice to bring it out of The Times archives:

Name the celebrated composer who wrote this about himself: ‘My greatest ambition consists only in being justly considered by all the world an honest man — which is what I am.’ Well, you can’t imagine Beethoven saying that; he would not have cared if all the world had thought him a rogue. You cannot imagine Mozart saying it either; life simply would not have presented itself to him in those terms. Nor Bach, who would have considered it an almost blasphemous form of solipsism; not Verdi, who had larger amibitions, nor Rossini, who was far too sophisticated to tempt fortune with such a remark, nor any of the romantics, who were more interested in their emotions, nor Richard Strauss, who could not have said it with a straight face. As for Wagner, he would not have had the slightest idea what it meant.

It must be, and is Haydn. And I write about him today for no better reason, and for no worse reason, than that the vast project, undertaken by Decca, of recording all his 104 symphonies with the same orchestra (the Philharmonia Hungarica) and conductor (Antal Dórati), is now just over halfway through; I have just carried home the sixth album and the collection now wants only the first 35 of his symphonies and the final 12. And if you think that that is insufficent reason for writing about Haydn, you may go and boil your head, and if you do not agree that Haydn is a great and lovely genius, a Titan fit to march in step with Beethoven and Mozart themselves, then your head will be none the worse for a boiling.

Mind you, if you do think that, you will be in company which if not good is at any rate plentiful. The trouble is that Haydn has too often been thought to be in the same trade as Beethoven and Mozart; after all, they were alive together for 21 years, they show an unbroken musical succession, they were all at least partly adopted Viennese, and they all spoke the same language; the consequence is that their names are as indissolubly linked as those of Freeman, Hardy and Willis. Haydn was in fact in a different part of the forest from the other two, but because he was not driven by Beethoven’s daemon or Mozart’s grim destiny is thought of as a kind of country-bumpkin cousin of theirs — ‘Papa’ Haydn — who would have written as well as they if only he had known how to, and strove to do so even though he did not. But the man who wrote the La Passione symphony (his 49th) need fear no charge that he is Beethoven-and-water, and the man who wrote the Clock (his 101st) is not Mozart-and-soda, either. The extraordinary thing is that, though Mozart wrote 41 symphonies to Haydn’s 104, and their symphonies are formally similar in many ways (which is not surprising, in view of the fact that Mozart’s 36 years fitted almost exactly into the middle of Haydn’s 77), it is almost impossible to mistake, even on first hearing, a work of one for a work of the other; Haydn was as completely sui generis as Mozart, and his style, too, was unique.

And then, what a style! The fecundity of his symphonic imagination is staggering; the comparison that comes to mind is with the songs of Schubert. And, however astonishing is the way in which we can instantly tell a Haydn symphony from one by Mozart, what is even more astonishing is the way in which we can instantly tell one symphony by Haydn from another. Apart from ten or so, I could not put the right numbers to them (my compliments to Mr Joseph Cooper, and if he takes this as an invitation to spring Haydn symphonies on me in the next series of Face the Music and to laugh like anything when I call the ninety-second the eigthy-eighth and vice versa, I beg to inform him that I will put him into his silent piano and nail it shut), but if you played me any dozen today, and any dozen tomorrow, I believe I could tell you without hesitation whether any of them had been in both days’ lists. For though they are all cut from the same roll of cloth, each one is fashioned anew, and each has a life and a character all its own.

Haydn was also, it is clear, one of the most endearing men who ever lived; I find infinitely appealing, for instance, the fact that he would not have dreamed of sitting down to compose without first donning his best clothes and wig (compare that with the dreadful description given by one of Beethoven’s last visitors, who found him in a frenzy of composition amid unutterable squalor, down to an unemptied chamber pot on the table). Born a peasant, Haydn retained all the peasant virtues and acquired none of the peasant vices; his religious faith was as uncomplicated as it was unquestioned, and every one of his manuscripts is headed ‘In Nomine Domini’ and concludes ‘Laus Deo’ (Beethoven, faced with a composition by a devout pupil who had put ‘Finished, with God’s help’ at the bottom, crossed it out and wrote ‘Man, help thyself’). It was typical of Haydn that his own favourite of all his compositions was the ‘Emperor’s Hymn’ (Gott erhalte Franz den kaiser) and it is not his fault that the world knows the tune rather better as Deutschland über Alles.

I am grateful to Decca; already, amid the collection, I have come across Haydn symphonies I had never heard before, and there will be many more of these as the very unfamiliar early ones appear. (O, for someone to publish an edition of Jane Austen with a dozen novels one has never read!) I shall listen, enrapt, to them all, and if you write to tell me that you don’t wish to know that, I will throw your letters unanswered into the wastepaper basket and probably set your house on fire, too.

David Stybr, Engineer and Composer: It's Left Brain vs. Right Brain: best 2 falls out of 3
Tango: Summer Night in Montevideo for Violin and Piano (3:20) ... reid=78610

Personal Assistant and Der Webmeister to author Denise Swanson
Murder of a Smart Cookie
Penguin Putnam ~ Signet, New York, NY

Dittersdorf Specialist & CMG NY Host
Posts: 20996
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 6:54 am
Location: Paradise on Earth, New York, NY

Post by Ralph » Sat Dec 03, 2005 7:46 am

Dorati did the first Haydn symphony cycle. The next, as far as I know, is the excellent Fischer cycle. The Hogwood project unfortunately ran out of money before all the symphonies could be recorded.

I would recommend Fischer first. Well-recorded and performed.

"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."

Albert Einstein

Posts: 41
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 3:26 pm
Location: USA

Post by Burchest » Sat Dec 03, 2005 12:49 pm

Ralph wrote:Dorati did the first Haydn symphony cycle. The next, as far as I know, is the excellent Fischer cycle. The Hogwood project unfortunately ran out of money before all the symphonies could be recorded.

I would recommend Fischer first. Well-recorded and performed.
I have both the Dorati and Fischer cycles and strongly recommend the Fischer. Fischer from the start is totally in tune with the music of Haydn. His tempi is well rounded and the sound is much better than the Dorati set.

Posts: 1713
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2003 1:15 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois, United States, North America, Earth, Solar System, Milky Way Galaxy, Universe

Post by MaestroDJS » Sat Dec 03, 2005 3:06 pm

Comparison shopping for recordings of Haydn symphonies? Someone has already done much of the work for us. I can vouch for Scott Foglesong because he is Chair of the Department of Musicianship and Music Theory at the San Francisco Conservatory of Music. Not only that, but he sure knows his Haydn. He has also been a member of the Classical Music SIG of Mensa (which I have coordinated for 2 decades) for over 15 years, so I am delighted to have him among our ranks. This article appears on his website, and he let me reprint it in our newsletter last year.

(He has also criticized many of my own compositions and given me invaluable advice, but still enjoys them, so apparently they have some redeeming qualities.) :D


David Stybr, Coordinator, Classical Music SIG (Special Interest Group) of American Mensa

David Stybr, Engineer and Composer: It's Left Brain vs. Right Brain: best 2 falls out of 3
Tango: Summer Night in Montevideo for Violin and Piano (3:20) ... reid=78610

Personal Assistant and Der Webmeister to author Denise Swanson
Murder of a Smart Cookie
Penguin Putnam ~ Signet, New York, NY

Scott Foglesong: Haydn Symphony Recordings ... y_recs.htm
! On Recordings

Don't assume that a period-instrument performance will be better or worse, ipso facto, than a "big band" performance. Musicianship (or lack thereof) is what really matters.

Haydn Symphony Recordings

The largest category in my recording collection is Haydn symphonies. Therefore I can speak with some insight about the virtues of various recordings. If you're thinking about acquiring some Haydn symphony recordings, this article may prove useful.


Complete Sets

Antal Doráti / Philharmonica Hungarica

This complete undertaking of all the symphonies dates from the late 1960s through the early 1970s. The performances are all on modern instruments without any particularly conscious effort towards being "period".

The strengths of this famous and amply-awarded milestone of modern recording are many. The playing is warm and sympathetic at all times and Doráti's handling of the musical needs of the works is first-rate throughout. In general this is a set of performances which emphasize elegance and clarity, in contrast to modern-day period-instrument groups which frequently emphasize the more passionate, or even rowdy, aspects of the music. (Sometimes one could wish for more of the rowdiness.) The commentary is by H.C. Robbins Landon, the most eminent Haydn scholar of the 20th century. The entire set can be had in a big box from Philips, or one can find the 4-CD volumes (originally from Decca) in used record stores.

Doráti was one the great forces in the dissemination of Haydn's music during the second half of the twentieth century. He also gave us first-rate recordings of most of the Esterházy operas, recordings which are in quite a few cases the only recordings ever made of these unjustly neglected works. The recordings are available in a 20-CD set (two volumes) from Philips, although one has to order from a European dealer to get them.

Adam Fischer / Austro-Hungarian Haydn Orchestra

To date this is the only absolutely complete single-group set besides the Doráti to have been brought to completion. The orchestra is composed of members of the Vienna Philharmonic and the Hungarian State Orchestras, with the makeup of the orchestra changing over the years as the recordings were made. (The project required well over a decade.) The set was originally put out by Nimbus, but when Nimbus went into receivership the set was re-issued by Brilliant Classics, in a 33-CD single-box set but no liner notes. With Nimbus returning from the dead, some of the recordings are becoming available in smaller sets with liner notes.

Conductor Adam Fischer, much like Antal Doráti, stresses the musical message and the most effective use of instruments over strictest historical accuracy. In a number of the earlier symphonies, Haydn appears to have provided several slightly different scorings, in particular in regards to trumpets and timpani. Wherever there is an alternate version using trumpets and timpani, Fischer obviously prefers to use them, even when the alternate version isn't all that well substantiated as actually being Haydn's. He's not a purist, in other words. Neither was Haydn for that matter.

Fischer takes a modern-day approach in dealing with repeats: he omits repeats in da capo sections, and will often omit the repeat of the second half of lengthy sonata-form movements. He follows the Robbins Landon recommendation of using keyboard continuo in the earlier symphonies, ending the practice in those symphonies from the 1770s onwards. The continuo is supportive but quite unobtrusive; in my opinion it's some of the best continuo playing around.

The recordings were all made in the Haydnsaal of Schloss Esterházy in Eisenstadt, one of the two halls where Haydn rehearsed and performed all of his symphonies up through the "Paris" set. It's a wonderfully 'alive' room, very supportive of the relatively small performing forces Haydn had at his disposal. Hearing Symphony No. 13 in this setting gives one a real sense of Haydn's spacious wind/brass writing in the first movement, which was designed to exploit the wide, expansive acoustic of the big room.

No group has done a better job with the big long adagios in the mid-period symphonies. Minor objections include very infrequent brass intonation problems, an occasional bit of sloppy ensemble, and an occasional flat-out goof that should have resulted in a re-take, but the overall standard for intonation and ensemble is quite high. They recorded the later symphonies first, and didn't quite have mastery over the boomy acoustic in the Haydnsaal, but by the end of the series (middle-period works) everybody involved had it all down to a science-with the result that the middle-period symphonies are typically the best performances in the set. We have only two complete single-group sets of the Haydn symphonies, but we are fortunate in that both of them are first-rate productions.

Naxos: Complete Haydn Symphonies (Various)

We can all be grateful for those wonderful people at Naxos and all those budget-priced recordings they are providing us, especially during a time when the recording industry appears to be imploding at an alarming rate.

Unlike Naxos's recordings of the complete Haydn string quartets, which are performed by one (first-rate) group, the recordings of the symphonies are by three different orchestras. The "Naxos secret" is to record lesser-known (hence more affordable) groups, so we do not expect to be hearing the Vienna Philharmonic. The three groups responsible for this set are the Northern Chamber Orchestra under Nicholas Ward, the Nicholas Esterházy Sinfonia under Bela Drahos, and the Cologne Chamber Orchestra under Helmut Müller-Brühl. All of them are good, with the Esterházy Sinfonia being a standout in my opinion.

Recording quality is invariably smooth and natural-sounding -- Naxos has intelligent engineers who have the good sense to know when to leave well enough alone. Program notes are simple, direct, and to the point. These recordings are rarely, if ever, the most interesting around, but they're definitely worth hearing.

I should also mention that Naxos puts out another set of 15 Haydn symphonies by the Capella Istropolitana under Barry Wordsworth, which are acceptable.

Partial Sets

Roy Goodman / Hanover Band

This set has been controversial from the get-go but it's always fun and always stimulating. The Hanover Band starts these recordings from a few basic precepts: 1) keyboard continuo throughout, mostly harpsichord with fortepiano for the London symphonies; 2) the keyboard continuo will be quite active and not background; 3) lots of gusto and bravura in the fast movements; 4) brass and timpani will play naturally-no holding back; 5) under no circumstances will any repeat ever be skipped.

I dearly wish they had finished the project; maybe they will some day. It's about halfway done-everything up to about #30, then a break, then the 40s are all represented, then another break, and then the 60s almost without break to the end, although there are some funny blanks even in the late symphonies (88-91, for example, and no 102-104.)

The Hanover Band is a pretty rowdy group and given Haydn's vitality, they have a wild and wooly time of it. Sometimes the rowdiness becomes downright aggressive. Sometimes the keyboard continuo becomes downright invasive. Sometimes slow movements don't work well-period instrument groups aren't always as warm as one might like.

But you've just gotta hear the Hanoverians romp their way through the finale of the "Clock" symphony, or turn the fugal finale of #95 into a sizzling tour de force, or provide the most tender, intimate, and magical rendering of the Andante of the "Surprise" symphony ever recorded. Any Haydn afficionado must have these recordings.

Bruno Weil / Tafelmusik

The period-instrument group Tafelmusik has recorded only about a dozen of the Haydn symphonies but they've done them very, very well. They have all the energy of the Goodman recordings (sometimes even more) but on the whole tend to be much better with slow movements. The group has a bigger, more rounded sound than the Hanoverians and a much more opulent sound than the Academy of Ancient Music.

Sometimes their tempi are too fast for comfort-the finale of #88 approaches incoherence at such a clip-but nobody can ever accuse them of sitting back and taking it easy. All of the recordings are highly recommended; they're on Sony Classical, well-engineered although given a rather skimpy presentation in terms of liner notes and kind of ugly artwork on the cases.

Richard Hickox / Collegium Musicum 90

Hickox has recorded a complete set of Haydn's masses, which are easily the most splendid recordings extant of these many wonderful works. (That's including the recent recordings of the later masses by John Eliot Gardiner and the English Baroque Soloists.) So far, recordings of the symphonies are limited to only half of the "London" symphonies-94, 95, 101-104. I presume Hickox and Chandos are planning to complete the London set with two more volumes; at least I hope they do.

The six (so far) recordings are my absolute favorite Haydn symphony recordings-for both technical and musical reasons. By 'technical' I refer not only to the orchestral playing (tiptop), but also the recording technology itself, which is spectacular. Tempi are beautifully considered. Orchestral sonority is rich, luminous, and properly brassy and drummy. (The last movement of Symphony 104 never received a more blistering, noble, and satisfying performance: I can imagine Haydn cheering the spectacular horn players.) Any future Haydn recordings from this ensemble and conductor will be instant additions to my collection.

Franz Brüggen / Orchestra of the 18th Century

Bruggen and his group have recorded the symphonies from #82 on through #104, with some earlier ones thrown in for good measure.

Most of these are live performances and so aren't always perfectly studio-polished. However, they're usually terrific, especially the glorious renderings of the later London symphonies. They're good about performance practice, eschewing continuo but going for a nice, fat sound with plenty of players per part.

I have found that the recording of the Paris symphonies suffers from a rather pinched recording sound-it doesn't seem to be the orchestra.

Christopher Hogwood / Academy of Ancient Music

This was planned as a big ambitious set of the complete symphonies, really giving Papa Joe the five-star treatment throughout. The series was projected to fill fifteen volumes, with 3 CDs per volume; it made it to Volume 10. The series was cancelled due to low sales, exacerbated by the general downturn in the recording industry. To add insult to injury, all but the most recent volumes have been allowed to go out of print.

It's a solid set, extremely careful in its approach to historical accuracy. The supervisor for the project was James Webster, one of today's most highly respected Haydn scholars. Each volume comes with a meticulously prepared and researched booklet which, all volumes taken together, would have made up a very fine monograph on the Haydn symphonies.

The recordings reflect this rigorously musicological approach: unlike the Fischer set, if there is any question that a particular instrument was not Haydn's original intention, it is left out, even if Haydn may have included the instrument in a later authenticated autograph. Virtually none of the early symphonies make use of trumpets or timpani. Webster is a strong advocate for the absence of continuo (either harpsichord or fortepiano) in Haydn's symphonies, and so there is no continuo anywhere-not even in the earliest works.

This puritanical attitude results in a set which is rather-well-prissy at times. Although there are individual performances which rank as my personal favorites (53, 60, and 63, for example), sometimes the performances fail to do justice to the red-blooded vigor of the works. Nor is the ensemble itself notable for attractive sound-they tend to sound pinched in quiet passages, raspy in louder ones, although there are very strong individual players in the group (such as Anthony Halstead on horn.)

Sir Neville Marriner / Academy of St. Martin in the Fields

This is a set from Philips called the "29 Name Symphonies"-i.e., those Haydn symphonies which have nicknames. Many of those symphonies are well-known (like the "Clock" or "Military" and so forth) but quite a few of them aren't so well known-say the "Fire" or "Laudon" or "Hornsignal". For some weird reason the "Alleluja" symphony (#30) isn't included-I suppose they just didn't record it.

I really love this set. This isn't a notably rambunctious group but what they may lack in elemental fire they make up for (and then some) with lyricism and gorgeous sound. And sometimes they burn with elemental fire as well. They are correct in terms of ornamentation and repeats and all that stuff, but they don't drop into starchiness, become inexplicably violent, or suffer from the weird intonation and ensemble problems that can plague even the best period-instrument groups. (They're a modern-instrument group.)

Since it's less than a third of the symphonies, it doesn't cost too much to purchase (about $70), and all of the performances are excellent. Some are considerably more than excellent-it's the best "Oxford" symphony out there. In particular this group shines with the lyrical symphonies (#43 "Mercury" is absolutely bewitching), and also tends to shine in the slow movements-especially the long contemplative adagios of those symphonies in the 40s and 50s. (Too many of those are nickname-less and so they're not on the set, doggone it.)

There is also a Philips set of the complete "Paris" symphonies, which adds the un-nicknamed 84, 86, and 87 to the above list.

Sigiswald Kuijken / La Petite Bande

This is another period-instrument group, with recordings of various symphonies-not very many overall, about twenty or so. (Some of the recordings are with the Orchestra of the 18th Century, and not La Petite Bande.)

They're good. On the whole there isn't anything in particular to recommend them over another period-instrument group; they have all the strengths and weaknesses of such groups without any of the extremes. But they play in tune, balance sonorities beautifully, select effective tempi, and in general play the symphonies quite well. I definitely prefer them to Hogwood's Academy of Ancient Music and rank them right about with Brüggen and the Orchestra of the 18th Century. All of their available Haydn recordings can be had in a nice boxed set, which includes a tip-top performance of the Sinfonia Concertante, which is generally listed as Symphony 105.

Trevor Pinnock / The English Concert

These are good, solid period-instrument performances, available in a 6-CD set called "The Sturm und Drang Symphonies" from DGG Archiv. The symphonies represented are: 35, 38, 39, 59, 26, 49, 58, 41, 48, 65, 43, 51, 52, 42, 44, 46, 45, 47, and 50. They're plagued a bit by Hogwoodian gentility but not to the degree of the Academy of Ancient Music recordings. There are some interesting ideas in the set-for example, this is the only recording I know of the "Maria Theresia" symphony (number 48 in C Major) which uses the high C alto horns and timpani; most recordings either opt for high C alto horns and no timpani, or trumpets in place of the horns and timpani. It's a fascinating sound, even if the tempo of the first movement is rather too slow.

Max Goberman / Vienna State Opera Orchestra

Dating from the 1960s, these were the first major attempt to record all of the Haydn symphonies. They didn't make it; there's about 40 of the symphonies.

We may be grateful to this group (and to the sponsoring Haydn Society) for starting the ball rolling with well-researched performances of the Haydn symphonies, using Haydn's instrumental balances and numbers rather than big modern orchestras with everybody trying to play "tiny". The great Haydn scholar H.C. Robbins Landon was present for the recordings and lent his tremendous expertise to solving various textural matters. The original tapes of the recordings seem to have been lost but CDs are available which were taken from good-quality vinyl pressings.

Kudos to these intrepid pioneers, and many thanks. However, the performances are mediocre at best-and often slide below the level of mediocre. Not recommended except to the historically curious.

"Big Band" Recordings

I refer here to sets recorded by some of the big mainstream symphony orchestras, which may cut down the numbers of instruments somewhat but retain a more-or-less modern instrument balance. The result is a lot of strings, with secondary woodwind, and a bit of brass and percussion. The big timpani are played with modern soft mallets and thus are always played piano or pianissimo regardless of Haydn's actual marking. Haydn's orchestration is much more wind-band than string orchestra; it places a great deal of weight on the winds, brass, and timpani. Thus big-band performances, while often very lovely, miss the mark where Haydn's unique scoring practices are concerned. They become a big wash of strings with brass and wind for color splashes. To my ear, this is a significant loss.

Leonard Bernstein / New York Philharmonic

Yes, Leonard Bernstein. He conducted the NY Phil in the two later sets-the "Paris" and the "London" symphonies. They're very interesting. I don't recommend them for one's only recordings of these works, but nonetheless they're stimulating. Typical of that synthetic-loving era, they're gaudily over-engineered: one wonders how on earth anybody ever thought up these balances, in which a single flute playing mezzo-piano manages somehow to drown out the massed forces of the entire Philharmonic.

Colin Davis / Concertgebouw Orchestra

This is a set of the "London" symphonies. For big-band Haydn, they're good. One certainly can't fault the orchestra itself, one of the world's finest.

I do have an objection to this particular set-and I don't care how many awards it has won-in that Davis takes a rather free hand with Haydn's indications. These interpolations-changes of articulation and/or dynamics-wind up irritating me quite a bit.

Bruno Walter / Columbia Symphony

Old-school performances of various (late) Haydn symphonies, elegant and wonderfully chummy. Twinkling, genial ol' Papa Haydn as the early 20th century saw him. But who can resist Walter's glorious lyrical approach? I bet Haydn would have liked them; he knew first-class musicianship when he heard it.

Hermann Scherchen / Vienna Symphony / Vienna State Opera Orchestra

These monophonic recordings come from the 1950s; most of them were previously available on the old Westminister label-source of some surprisingly terrific performances. The available CDs of these performances are mastered from good-quality vinyl pressings. (That means that they're overly boomy given that LPs were equalized with emphasized bass to compensate for poor bass response in the playback equipment of the day.)

They're pretty decent on the whole, although tempi sure tend to be slow. Scherchen had a very lyrical conception of Haydn-sort of the "Papa" Haydn style favored by conductors like Szell and Walter. They make an interesting comparison to more recent recordings which are more fully informed by modern musicology.

Posts: 719
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 6:00 am
Location: Dutch Sierra

Post by herman » Sat Dec 03, 2005 4:32 pm


Too bad the aptly named Foglesong ("Bird Song") doesn't mention the wonderful London Symphonies Harnoncourt recorded with the Concertgebouw. Most people respond extremely well to those recordings.

Site Administrator
Posts: 27663
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 2:25 am
Location: The Great State of Utah

Post by Corlyss_D » Sat Dec 03, 2005 7:31 pm

Ralph wrote:Dorati did the first Haydn symphony cycle. The next, as far as I know, is the excellent Fischer cycle. The Hogwood project unfortunately ran out of money before all the symphonies could be recorded.

I would recommend Fischer first. Well-recorded and performed.
I have both. The Dorati I still have in LPs. They will always be my sentimental favorites.
Contessa d'EM, a carbon-based life form

Posts: 275
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 9:04 pm

Post by Richard » Sat Dec 03, 2005 7:58 pm

Did Max Goberman die before he could complete all of the symphonies?

Posts: 392
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 12:02 pm
Location: Aiken, SC

Post by gfweis » Sun Dec 04, 2005 5:31 pm

There is a conductor who recorded a set of the Haydn symphonies who has not been mentioned: Ernst Maerzendorfer, conducting the Vienna Chamber Orchestra. They appeared in chronological order on, it seems, 48 lps (I surmise this since I possess Vol. 47, which has Nos. 101 & 102). They were on the Musical Heritage Society and Orpheus labels, but even the ones that say "Orpheus," also say "Musical Heritage Society" on the lps themselves. I am lucky to have about 35 of these lps, most of which I picked up at a thrift store. They are uniformly excellent, both warm and spirited, with menuets that are not too heavy or slow. The orchestra displays superb ensemble and plays in tune. It would be delightful if these were to come out on cd, but I'm not optimistic about that. I once contacted MHS to see if they had any such plans. The person who answered said he didn't know anything about them.
Greg Weis

Posts: 832
Joined: Fri May 23, 2003 11:16 pm
Location: San Antonio, Texas

Post by dirkronk » Mon Dec 05, 2005 10:55 am

I too have many (not all) of the Dorati recordings of Haydn on LP, and while they are "sentimental" favorites for me, as they are for Corlyss, I'm not so sure that they aren't still performance and sonic favorites. About eight or nine months ago, I decided to do some Haydn-spinning with some then-recent purchases as well as some items from the local library. During this time, I familiarized myself with Kuijken, Harnoncourt, a smattering of Bruggen, and revisited Marriner, Davis and a few others. All on CD. Then I went home and played Dorati on LP and found myself enjoying the music at least as much and frequently more. Lively and fun, and recorded in a splendidly open acoustic. Thus, I have to wonder when Mr. Foglesong characterizes Dorati's as "warm and sympathetic" performances that "emphasize elegance and clarity," since I hear no lack of passion and (on occasion) rowdyness...though I admit that I haven't the range of experience with newer/HIP recordings that Mr. F apparently does. Still, his commentary here and elsewhere in his article leads me to wonder if the CD transfers render quite the same sonic impact as the original vinyl.

One of the nicest aspects of my own Haydn-fest was a rediscovery of just how wonderful Szell's late Haydn still sounds to my ears, even though it falls into Mr. F's "Big Band" designation. I agree with his reticence about Davis' versions and I do enjoy Scherchen, though I'm not quite so enamored of Bernstein and Walter.

Still, I've found that the local library now has some of the Goodman/Hanover Band recordings and I'll make it a point to listen to those. And based on the apparent consensus here, I suppose I should make an effort to hear the Adam Fischer. Perhaps one of the Brilliant boxes will appear for peanuts at a retail establishment near me. Stranger things have happened.



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests