Sirius and XM to Merge

Locked
Ralph
Dittersdorf Specialist & CMG NY Host
Posts: 20996
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 6:54 am
Location: Paradise on Earth, New York, NY

Sirius and XM to Merge

Post by Ralph » Mon Feb 19, 2007 2:13 pm

Breaking News from ABCNEWS.com:

SATELLITE RADIO PROVIDERS SIRIUS AND XM WILL MERGE, ABC NEWS HAS CONFIRMED. SIRIUS
HEAD MEL KARMAZIN WILL RUN THE MERGE
Image

"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."

Albert Einstein

Corlyss_D
Site Administrator
Posts: 27663
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 2:25 am
Location: The Great State of Utah
Contact:

Post by Corlyss_D » Mon Feb 19, 2007 2:26 pm

Eeeeeewwwww! Change. I don't like it already.

NEW YORK (Reuters) - The two main satellite radio providers, XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. (XMSR.O: Quote) and Sirius (SIRI.O: Quote) are expected to announce a long-awaited merger on Monday, according to the New York Post.

The newspaper said the two companies were negotiating over the weekend to merge, a deal expected to be structured as a "merger of equals."

Representatives of the two companies could not immediately be reached for comment.

After months of speculation, chatter has escalated about a possible deal. Sirius and XM are adding subscribers rapidly to their pay-radio services, but losing money as they try to improve technology and sign top entertainment ranging from the largest U.S. sports leagues to media celebrities such as Howard Stern, Oprah Winfrey and Martha Stewart.

A deal would face tough scrutiny from U.S. regulators. It probably would face stiff opposition from the National Association of Broadcasters, which represents local radio stations and is one of the most powerful lobbying groups in Washington.

Federal licenses for the satellite services prohibit one entity from owning them. However, Federal Communications Commission Chairman Kevin Martin has said the licenses could be altered, if requested.

A merger also would require approval from U.S. antitrust authorities.

A tie-up could save the combined companies $7 billion and end their fierce battle for dominance, Stifel Nicolaus analysts said in a client note in January.

But other observers say a deal may not be smart, since the companies have incompatible radio hardware, and each is locked into expensive, long-term content deals. Even more, a merger may confuse consumers, who already have many other leisure options, such as iPods, video games and Internet media.

The newspaper on Monday said Sirius, due to its higher enterprise value, would end up with a bigger piece of the combined company, with chief executive Mel Karmazin taking the CEO role.

But Bear Sterns analyst Robert Peck, who suggested on Friday that investors push the two companies to combine, said XM would own about 55 percent of the new company.

New York-based Sirius, satellite radio home to Howard Stern and the National Football League, ended 2006 with more than 6 million subscribers. Washington-based XM, which carries Major League Baseball games and shows produced by Oprah Winfrey, said it ended 2006 with more than 7.6 million subscribers.

Shares of XM closed on Friday at $13.98 on the New York Stock Exchange, while Sirius shares closed at $3.70 on Nasdaq.
link
Corlyss
Contessa d'EM, a carbon-based life form

Ted

Post by Ted » Mon Feb 19, 2007 5:59 pm

As an XM subscriber from day one and like my fellow subscriber CD, I am not happy about this, but my umbrage is base largely on being tossed around by Mel Karmazin and his corporate cronies.

I have no interest in Howard Stern.

I do find this little blurb from ABC News amusing:
The deal would face significant regulatory hurdles in Washington, including a Federal Communications Commission rule that clearly states that one satellite radio provider cannot buy the other one. However, that rule could be waived.
http://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory?id=2887567

Corlyss_D
Site Administrator
Posts: 27663
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 2:25 am
Location: The Great State of Utah
Contact:

Post by Corlyss_D » Mon Feb 19, 2007 6:33 pm

Ted wrote:As an XM subscriber from day one and like my fellow subscriber CD, I am not happy about this, but my umbrage is base largely on being tossed around by Mel Karmazin and his corporate cronies.
All I care about is Martin Goldsmith, Robert Aubry Davis, and Jonathan Schwartz. Look at what happened to WGMS-WETA in their merger: the people who knew classical music were tossed out while the people who did talk radio were retained.
Corlyss
Contessa d'EM, a carbon-based life form

Ted

Post by Ted » Mon Feb 19, 2007 6:43 pm

CD Writes:
All I care about is Martin Goldsmith, Robert Aubry Davis, and Jonathan Schwartz
CD... Speaking of Davis and the “Village” Do you ever listen to Theme Time Radio Hour…I hope XM’s Classical stations remain intact...I’m also keen on Goldsmith

Corlyss_D
Site Administrator
Posts: 27663
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 2:25 am
Location: The Great State of Utah
Contact:

Post by Corlyss_D » Mon Feb 19, 2007 6:48 pm

Ted wrote:CD Writes:
All I care about is Martin Goldsmith, Robert Aubry Davis, and Jonathan Schwartz
CD... Speaking of Davis and the “Village” Do you ever listen to Theme Time Radio Hour
No. Should I? I was never a big Dylan fan - the guy can't sing worth a tinker's damn.
Corlyss
Contessa d'EM, a carbon-based life form

Ted

Post by Ted » Mon Feb 19, 2007 7:00 pm

No. Should I? I was never a big Dylan fan - the guy can't sing worth a tinker's damn.
It’s not about his music—he’d hang himself before he made mention of anything but the most obscure tunes you’ve never heard—I’ll send you an Mp3, broadcast times and if you’re interested my “full package”

Corlyss_D
Site Administrator
Posts: 27663
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 2:25 am
Location: The Great State of Utah
Contact:

Post by Corlyss_D » Mon Feb 19, 2007 7:15 pm

Ted wrote:
No. Should I? I was never a big Dylan fan - the guy can't sing worth a tinker's damn.
It’s not about his music—he’d hang himself before he made mention of anything but the most obscure tunes you’ve never heard—I’ll send you an Mp3, broadcast times and if you’re interested my “full package”
Ted, as ever, you are too kind to me.

{{{{smooch}}}}
Corlyss
Contessa d'EM, a carbon-based life form

Ted

Post by Ted » Mon Feb 19, 2007 7:40 pm

CD Writes:
Ted, as ever, you are too kind to me.

{{{{smooch}}}}
Hogwash but I’ll take the smooch—On the other hand I'm about to “rip you a new you-know-what” on the “Obsession” thread

Ralph
Dittersdorf Specialist & CMG NY Host
Posts: 20996
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 6:54 am
Location: Paradise on Earth, New York, NY

Post by Ralph » Mon Feb 19, 2007 8:13 pm

I can get along without any satellite radio.
Image

"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."

Albert Einstein

Ralph
Dittersdorf Specialist & CMG NY Host
Posts: 20996
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 6:54 am
Location: Paradise on Earth, New York, NY

Post by Ralph » Mon Feb 19, 2007 11:04 pm

From The New York Times:

February 20, 2007
Merger Would End Satellite Radio’s Rivalry
By RICHARD SIKLOS and ANDREW ROSS SORKIN

The nation’s two satellite radio services, Sirius and XM, announced plans yesterday to merge, a move that would end their costly competition for radio personalities and subscribers but that is also sure to raise antitrust issues.

The two companies, which report close to 14 million subscribers, hoped to revolutionize the radio industry with a bevy of niche channels offering everything from fishing tips to salsa music, and media personalities like Howard Stern and Oprah Winfrey, with few commercials. But neither has yet turned an annual profit and both have had billions in losses.

While there had been speculation of a merger, neither side had engaged in serious negotiations until December, when both companies determined it was in their best interests to complete a deal while the Bush administration was in power, people in the negotiations said.

The companies said yesterday that their $13 billion merger — code-named Project Big Sky by XM — would give consumers a broader range of programming, while eliminating overlapping stations that focus on genres of music. At the same time, they said, they could cut duplicated costs in sales and marketing.

A merger would require antitrust approval from the Justice Department and would have to be considered in the public interest by the Federal Communications Commission.

Under their operating licenses, XM and Sirius were prohibited from ever owning each other’s license. The commission could waive that rule. But critics pointed to its rejection of the merger of the satellite television broadcasters EchoStar and DirecTV four years ago.

Questioned last month about a possible Sirius-XM merger, the F.C.C. chairman, Kevin J. Martin, initially appeared to be skeptical, but later said that if such a deal were proposed, the agency would consider it.

In a statement yesterday, Mr. Martin acknowledged that the F.C.C. rule could complicate a merger but said the commission would evaluate the proposal. “The hurdle here, however, would be high,” he said.

The proposed merger, first reported yesterday by The New York Post, promises to be a test of whether regulators will see a combination of XM and Sirius as a monopoly of satellite radio communications or whether they will consider other audio entertainment, like iPods, Internet radio and HD radio, to be competitors.

“If the only competition to XM is Sirius, then you don’t let the deal through,” said Blair Levin, managing director of Stifel Nicolaus & Company and a former F.C.C. chief of staff. But Mr. Blair said he expected the F.C.C. to approve the merger.

“It’s my view that in looking at this picture, the Justice Department is going to conclude that the market is contestable, that there’s various ways these services compete and they’ll allow this merger.”

Both Sirius and XM have been rapidly adding customers since they began selling the concept of subscription-based radio available coast to coast about six years ago. XM ended 2006 with nearly eight million customers but Sirius increased its subscriber base by 80 percent last year, to about six million, after it signed Mr. Stern in a $725 million cash and stock deal.

Still, both companies had expected faster growth, and the real number of subscribers may be less than appears at first glance. Many receive the service free for a trial period when buying a new car or truck.

The two services have paid a high price for their growth. They have some $6 billion in accumulated losses. Both companies’ share prices have slumped recently as investors cooled on the companies’ prospects for generating profits, given the heavy costs of acquiring programming talent like Mr. Stern and the radio rights to the National Football League and Major League Baseball.

The companies’ services are, for the moment, not compatible. If the merger were approved, officials said yesterday, they would provide subscribers with technology that would allow them access to both services.

Each sells subscriptions for $12.95 a month. The cost of the combined service is yet to be determined.

Pricing the service is only one of many commercial and operational challenges the merger would face. For one thing, XM has prided itself on being advertising-free while Sirius sells ads on its talk radio fare, including Mr. Stern’s shows.

Craig E. Moffett, an analyst with Sanford C. Bernstein & Company, said it was not clear that Mr. Stern, Ms. Winfrey and some of the other major draws on the channels would be readily accessible to the merged companies’ wider audience.

Mel Karmazin, the longtime broadcasting executive who has been chief executive of Sirius for the past two years, said he had tried to reach Mr. Stern, who is on vacation, but had not yet done so, and a company spokesman said Sirius does not discuss its contracts.

The new company’s name and where it would be based — Sirius is in New York and XM in Washington — have not yet been determined. Mr. Karmazin would continue as chief executive while Gary Parsons, XM’s chairman, would remain as chairman of the merged company.

In an interview yesterday, Mr. Karmazin and Mr. Parsons said they had studied the regulatory challenge and believed they could prove the combination would be in the public interest.

Mr. Parsons said that unlike EchoStar and DirecTV, whose only rival was cable television, the satellite radio companies have a very small audience compared with the ways people get music, information and entertainment in audio formats, including iPods and the Internet. “The only thing that you could even think of as similar between those companies and us is that they both use satellites,” Mr. Karmazin said.

But critics are lining up. The National Association of Broadcasters, a trade group that represents broadcast radio and television stations, issued a statement within hours of the XM-Sirius announcement.

“In coming weeks, policy makers will have to weigh whether an industry that makes Howard Stern its poster child should be rewarded with a monopoly,” it said.

XM and Sirius had been in a mating dance for years, with Mr. Karmazin and Mr. Parsons flirting both publicly and privately. They began serious talks just before Christmas.

Anxious about Mr. Karmazin and Mr. Parsons being spotted together, the two sides decided to meet in an inconspicuous spot: the Upper East Side apartment of one of Mr. Parsons’s bankers, Dennis S. Hersch, a former lawyer who joined JPMorgan Chase two years ago.

Mr. Karmazin met with Mr. Parsons for several hours in Mr. Hersch’s living room one morning in late December. They sat on sofas flanked by their advisers, James B. Lee and Mr. Hersch of JPMorgan Chase, which represented XM, and Paul Taubman of Morgan Stanley, which worked for Sirius. The men decided to pursue a deal.

An army of merger and antitrust lawyers for both sides worked several marathon weeks of conference calls and trips to Washington to gauge the political climate for the transaction before opining that the deal should pass regulatory muster. Simpson Thacher & Bartlett and Wiley Rein are representing Sirius; XM is being advised by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom; Jones Day; and Latham & Watkins.

About a month later, the two sides reconvened, this time at Mr. Karmazin’s apartment in the Trump International Hotel and Tower just off Columbus Circle overlooking Central Park. It was a daylong negotiation. But both sides were far apart on price: Mr. Karmazin didn’t want to pay much of a premium and Mr. Parsons was seeking an even higher one than he got yesterday. Mr. Parsons and his advisers left the apartment thinking the talks might collapse.

About a week later, after talking to their boards, the two sides were coaxed back together, both giving a little on price. Two weeks ago, Mr. Parsons returned to Mr. Karmazin’s apartment. This time, the men reached a deal and shook hands on it.

Jeremy W. Peters contributed reporting.
Image

"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."

Albert Einstein

burnitdown
Posts: 229
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 1:15 am
Contact:

Post by burnitdown » Mon Feb 19, 2007 11:51 pm

Now even fewer entities control what you watch and hear. Is this progress?

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests