Jew Süss (1934) Lothar Mendes, Director

Here's the place to talk about DVDs (or VHS) films and movies you have seen on television and recommend or don't recommend. Discuss actors and scores, too.

Moderators: Lance, Corlyss_D

Post Reply
Belle
Posts: 5136
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2015 10:45 am

Jew Süss (1934) Lothar Mendes, Director

Post by Belle » Mon Jan 30, 2023 7:05 am

This very important film from Gaumont/Michael Balcon in 1934 is based on the historical figure Joseph Suss Oppenheimer who worked in the court at Stuttgart in the 18th Century. The film was remade by the Nazis in 1940 for anti-Jewish propaganda purposes and that one was a hideous distortion of the 1934 film. Mendes' film (made in England) is right for the time (any time, in fact) and it reflects the plight of the Jewish people in 20th Century Germany. Mendes was a leading Director for UFA in Germany before leaving when the Nazis came to power. Both he and Veidt were labelled traitors. The war had many more victims than those directly in the line of fire or if they were Jewish - though their suffering wasn't, of course, proportionate. Veidt was homesick for Germany till the day he died.

Joseph Goebbels found out that their famous German actor Conrad Veidt was to play the lead role of Joseph Oppenheimer and ordered that Veidt give up the role. Veidt refused, as he'd married a Jewish woman and hated what his country had become during the rise of the Nazi Party.

Conrad Veidt was not only a consummate actor (his role in this 1934 film is just stunning), he was a tremendously brave man who took huge personal risks to defy the Nazis. He was threatened with jail during his last trip to Germany (before war broke out) and only the intercession of the British saved him from a fate worse than death.

Jew Süss is badly in need of restoration and apparently it also had another title, "Power", in the USA. There were also cuts made because of censorship, so the finished film was anywhere from 120 minutes to 140 in length. Finding viable remnants of the film will be necessary to complete a restoration. Sadly not much can be done with the sound, except to remove some of the clicks and pops.

Veidt shows a great depth of emotion in this role though, only infrequently, does he descend into bathos. This film was made only 7 years after the inception of sound and two things are still evident: vestigial over-emphasized gestures at times, which were a feature of silent film and, as Howard Hawks once pondered, how much dialogue should be used in a sound film? In this film it tends to be too noisy in parts and too quiet in others.

The scene from 1:00:7 when he learns his daughter has died is totally devastating. Conrad Veidt's eyes were his most remarkable means of storytelling as well as his body language; he glides elegantly through some scenes with poise and aplomb and at others with the mien and bearing of a man crushed by grief. (You can see why he was so attractive to the female characters.) Joseph Suss Oppenheimer finds out during the course of the film that he's not Jewish after all, and the response from Veidt to that character's knowledge and all that it has cost him is moving. This film is, at times, melodramatic, showing its age, and there are actors who speak with at least 3 different accents, including Oppenheimer's daughter - who speaks King's English!! What intrigues me is the kissing on the lips of father with daughter and mother - something we don't do today. And I've hardly ever seen any scene in a Veidt film where he kisses a woman romantically; the films always fall short of this, for some strange reason.

This is an effective piece of cinema, despite the flaws, which was a product of the zeitgeist - more compelling for today's audiences because of what we've learned since it was made.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dMTHwuQnIKA

As I've said before, a profile like Barrymore!

Image

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests