Oooops, I just saw that typo now! Thanks, Karl....what was I thinking of...?!karlhenning wrote:Jack, you joker! The Concerto is of course in A Major.Jack Kelso wrote:MOZART: Clarinet Concerto in A Minor, KV 622
Jack
A fresh list every day? Wouldn't that mean a fresh desert island every day? So how do you move the Thousand Islands to the South Pacific and give them sandy beaches?karlhenning wrote:Today's list:
Messiaen, Quatuor pour la fin du temps
Hindemith, Symphony in E-flat
Prokofiev, Symphony No. 7
Sibelius, Symphony No. 3
Berlioz, Les Troyens
Yes, as I find the question fundamentally impossible :-)srappoport wrote:A fresh list every day?
If I could have only five recordings on a desert island, I wouldn't choose the five pieces I like the best, because I'd get tired of them, disgusted with them, after overexposure. So I admit that I have been cited for non-compliance with the Desert Island Scenario :-)Wouldn't that mean a fresh desert island every day?
There is something to what you are saying. But I recently attended three performances of Un ballo in maschera and was ready for more, as I was finding that the more I watched and heard it, the more I was understanding what Verdi was doing. Perhaps 85 times would be too much though.karlhenning wrote:If I could have only five recordings on a desert island, I wouldn't choose the five pieces I like the best, because I'd get tired of them, disgusted with them, after overexposure. So I admit that I have been cited for non-compliance with the Desert Island Scenario
Check out Julian Budden's masterful 3-volume work on Verdi's operas, and Vincent Godefroy's 2-volume work on same. It could cut down considerably the number of hearings just to appreciate what Verdi was doing. When you get ready for Aida, check out Hans Busch's Verdi's Aida. Well worth the effort to get it and read up on the opera beforehand.srappoport wrote:I was finding that the more I watched and heard it, the more I was understanding what Verdi was doing. Perhaps 85 times would be too much though.
I used to do that too, esp. opera. I had two season tickets to the Washington Opera back when their season consisted of 4 operas (the 70s).I had a recent experience with a concert consisting of Mozart's overture to Cossi fan tutti, his 25th concerto, and his 39th symphony. I went to both performances (by the Chamber Orchestra of Philadelphia) because I like the concerto so much. There are two more concerts of Mozart's works, and I proably will do the same thing again.
Sure--like Brahms' First (6/8) opposed to 3/4 (Schumann's Third). But I don't hear any "pompous" tones there....keninottawa wrote:You mean the timpani in the opening movement doesn't do it for ya?Jack Kelso wrote:That's pretty funny. I've never heard it described like that.keninottawa wrote:- Robert Schumann's Symphony no.3 'Rhenish': Pompous and exciting! 'Nuff said.
Jack
Certainly, the many riches of the literature repay sustained and repeated visitation!srappoport wrote:There is something to what you are saying. But I recently attended three performances of Un ballo in maschera and was ready for more, as I was finding that the more I watched and heard it, the more I was understanding what Verdi was doing. Perhaps 85 times would be too much though.
I guessed that was what you had in view, Ken; it is curious that in our day, so many take pompous right away as pejorative! I caught myself in this, when we were reading Stainer's The Crucifixion in choir a year or so ago . . . a couple of passages are marked Pomposo, and it was all I could do to keep from laughing.keninottawa wrote:I suppose by 'pompous' I meant 'with much pomp' as opposed to 'pretentious and snooty'. Schumann doesn't strike me as the snooty type!
Agreed! May I welcome myself to the club...?!karlhenning wrote:I guessed that was what you had in view, Ken; it is curious that in our day, so many take pompous right away as pejorative! I caught myself in this, when we were reading Stainer's The Crucifixion in choir a year or so ago . . . a couple of passages are marked Pomposo, and it was all I could do to keep from laughing.keninottawa wrote:I suppose by 'pompous' I meant 'with much pomp' as opposed to 'pretentious and snooty'. Schumann doesn't strike me as the snooty type!
Cheers,
~Karl
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests